Very Cool Parts

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 45

Thread: Air Oil Separators

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    322
    Post Thanks / Like

    Air Oil Separators

    Hi Guys I have been looking at the Perrin AOS. I like the cyclonic action of the air, it makes sense and I don't like the idea of throwing oil mist into the intake of any engine. Does any body have any experience with other brands?http://perrinperformance.com
    image.jpg

  2. #2
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Here's an excellent article I found on the various types of crankcase ventilation systems. It also explains what crankcase ventilation is and why you need it. The article goes into the pros and cons of each type and even provides an overall recommendation.

    Everything from open-to-atmosphere to vent-to-exhaust-via-venturi.

    There's six pages. So get to reading/clicking.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like
    I ordered the Perrin AOS a few days ago. Never used an AOS before, but it seems to be better designed than most. An alternative would probably be Crawford, but they borrow innovation from each other as far as I can tell. I've heard from several Subaru owners, tuners, and companies that all say an AOS is almost necessary for track days and highly recommended for daily driving. Everybody has their opinions, but I went with the consensus / my gut feeling on this one and got the Perrin.

  4. #4
    fasterer and furiouser longislandwrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    2,540
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    6
    Popular opinion is that a catch can is better on a track car than an AOS... the benefit of the AOS is that it is zero maintenance and doesn't need to be emptied, on a track car emptying before/after a race is NBD

    Track cars and looser motors with more blowby are also usually too much for an AOS.

    AOSes are also not recommended for vehicles typically do short drives and ones don't spend much time at operating temperature as they tend to create the oil/water vapor foam. The Perrin's design reduces (doesn't eliminate) this at the cost of being larger heavier more expensive and requiring coolant lines. It is a very nice unit though.

    For this car, I was originally going to go with a GS AOS but I will just save the money and get a std catch can.
    A well stocked beverage fridge is the key to any successful project.

  5. #5
    Senior Member wleehendrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Encinitas, CA
    Posts
    1,653
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    2
    For my 818, I think a simple catch can is preferred/sufficient over an AOS. After looking into it, I see there are numerous ways to hook them up. From this thread:

    How should a catch can be installed?

    There are a variety of ways to install a catch can. There's one right way, two sort-of right ways, and some would argue that at least one common installation method which is wrong.

    Sort of right ways:
    1) Disconnect the hose which runs between the PCV valve and the turbo inlet pipe. Run a line from the PCV to the catch can, and another line from the catch can to the turbo inlet hose.

    2) Disconnect the hose running between the crank case breather lines and the turbo inlet pipe. Run new hose between the breather line and the catch can and another hose between the can and the inlet pipe.

    Right way:
    Use two catch cans. Configure one as discussed in option one and the other as described in option 2. For optimal effectiveness, this is the way to go.

    Wrong way:
    Disconnect the PCV<->Inlet line as well as the Crank Vent<->Inlet line. "T" the PCV and Crank vent lines together, and run the remaining end of the "T" to a single nipple on the inlet pipe. Cap the remaining nipple on the inlet. You'll be sending boost into places that definitely shouldn't ever see any. Bad idea.


    I haven't read through all 12 pages of the thread; what's preferred on the EJ? Are 2 cans necessary?

    Thanks,

    Lee

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    198
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just in case anybody wants more info on AOS ( may also be good info for catch can ), here are downloadable instructions for a couple of AOS systems:

    http://www.crawfordperformance.com/w...-Version-2.pdf and http://perrinperformance.com/attachment/78718-.pdf

    Note that both of these units are designed to run coolant lines to them to heat it up and reduce the amount of sludge. To my knowledge, these are the only two AOS manufacturers who built a heating system into the unit. I've never used either so I don't have a review on how it works, but I'm planning on using the Perrin because they explained how it worked better and you can disassemble it. The Crawford that many swear by cannot be disassembled as far as I know.

  7. #7
    Member Westview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland
    Posts
    78
    Post Thanks / Like
    If you have some time on your hands, like hours worth, you can read this thread on the topic: The Official STi engine Venting, A/O Separators, and Catch Cans Thread!!

    I use a Crawford AOS on my 2008 STI. There doesn't seem to be a perfect solution.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Carrollton, Ga.
    Posts
    297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Rasmus - agree - terrific article; thanks for posting. Who makes an active pump system for the Subies- anyone know?

    Thanks,

    Bill

  9. #9
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Waters View Post
    Rasmus - agree - terrific article; thanks for posting. Who makes an active pump system for the Subies- anyone know?

    Moroso's Universal Fit.

    I haven't seen one. Might be because if you're at the level of HP that needs an active vacuum pump you're making your own brackets.

    But using slash cut venturii in the the exhaust, after the catalytic converter, is a great, inexpensive way to generate vacuum. Plus they generate lots of vacuum in boost and at WOT when you need it the most.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    278
    Post Thanks / Like
    I run the GS AOS with a inline AOS made for air compressors on the line that goes back to the turbo inlet. The GS AOS didn't quite keep up with track conditions. With the GS and the inline, my intake is bone dry even after the hardest driving I've thrown at it.

    The Venturi looks cool and just enough mad scientist to be up my alley. May look into that.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Carrollton, Ga.
    Posts
    297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks again, Rasmus. Do you know of a schematic, plans, etc. existing for the slash cut venturi system you describe? I certainly understand the principle and can fabricate pretty much anything I need, but it would be great to have a well-sorted design so that I can limit the experimental phase. After all, we are all already 818 beta-testers!

    Thanks,

    Bill

  12. #12
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Waters View Post
    Thanks again, Rasmus. Do you know of a schematic, plans, etc. existing for the slash cut venturi system you describe?
    I'll sketch one up.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Carrollton, Ga.
    Posts
    297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks

  14. #14
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like

    Rasmus' Idea of an Efficient Crankcase Ventilation System



    Where ports 1 and 2 are on a 2006 WRX EJ255 case.


    Another view of port 2


    Another view of port 1
    Last edited by Rasmus; 03-21-2014 at 09:20 PM.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    278
    Post Thanks / Like
    I wonder what pressure the Venturi would draw. IE what the psi rating for the check valve and related tubing would have to be.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Carrollton, Ga.
    Posts
    297
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks very much, Rasmus: this is really helpful. Regarding the slash-cut venturi, I presume 45-degree entry of the venturi tube into the exhaust pipe and 45 degree slash (rendering an opening which is downstream to exhaust flow and perpendicular to the wall of the exhaust pipe) is the most effective. Searches on the topic yield only non-authoritative discussions and opinions. Have you seen any reliable info on that?

    I really appreciate your always going the extra mile to help.

    Bill

  17. #17
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Waters View Post
    Regarding the slash-cut venturi, I presume 45-degree entry of the venturi tube into the exhaust pipe and 45 degree slash (rendering an opening which is downstream to exhaust flow and perpendicular to the wall of the exhaust pipe) is the most effective.

    I don't know if it's the most effective. I do know that's the common wisdom on how to install it. It's High School Physics Science Project Time! Get a bunch of straws, cut 'em up and see what angles and cuts pull the most vacuum in a known flow.



    I do know fluids in a pipe flow the slowest right near the walls. There's shear forces slowing stuff down. So, for me, in a 3 inch exhaust I'd get the venturi tube opening in there about 5/8" to 1" off the wall, measured perpendicular. The faster the exhaust flows over the slash-cut tube's opening the more vacuum it pulls. Which is way this method works great under boost or at WOT; you're pushing a lot of fluid, very fast, past that opening. Installing it in half-way (1.5") seems over-kill.
    Last edited by Rasmus; 03-22-2014 at 08:53 AM. Reason: Added Picture

  18. #18
    Senior Member Xusia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Probably a stupid question, but someone has to ask them: If there is an OEM air/oil separator, why is an external one needed? Please explain the problem we are trying to solve. In a language someone like me can understand!

  19. #19
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Xusia View Post
    Probably a stupid question, but someone has to ask them: If there is an OEM air/oil separator, why is an external one needed?
    I like the brain on you Xusia. That is an excellent question.

    The OEM air/oil separator is not terribly effective when someone starts pushing these motors to the limit. With frequent boost (autox, track day), High G cornering, and hard braking,; one can easily overwhelm it. If you've ever opened up your inlet tube, turbo, inter-cooler, and/or intake manifold and seen oil coating everything you realize how easy you can overwhelm the system. Not only does everything get oily, your intercoolers efficiency is reduced from the oil coating. Worst of all, sucking oil into the combustion mix reduces the octane rating of your fuel causing knock. Knock is what blows motors and spins bearings.

    So what I'm trying to do is keep my parts that aren't supposed to be oily from getting oily, prevent my motor from going boom, and keep my engine's oil off the track.
    Last edited by Rasmus; 03-22-2014 at 08:51 AM. Reason: engarish bees reel hard, yo

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Bowling Green, KY
    Posts
    1,382
    Post Thanks / Like
    FYI if you plan to race the car in NASA or SCCA you might check the rule books, I know at one time a slash cut system were not allowed so it will be worth checking.
    They do work, we did see small bump in the dyno numbers with it connected on our GT3 Datsun a number of years ago. We had to take it off when we had a tech inspector who knew his stuff notice it.
    Last edited by Mitch Wright; 03-22-2014 at 09:58 AM.

  21. #21
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like

    Here's a better view of the OEM in-case Air-Oil Separator.
    Yep. That's it.

    Notice how there's nothing for the oil to condense onto. It's separated into an upper and lower half with the case gasses entering in the lower half. They pass by the edges of the baffle and enter the upper half where the condensing is supposed to occur before making it's way up to the PCV one-way check valve and then into your turbo inlet tube. Your turbo compressor wheel sucks it up. Passes it though the inter-cooler, throttle-body, then intake manifold. Finally getting burned up in the combustion mix.


    I suppose one could put one of those stainless steel coil kitchen scrubbers in the upper-half. It'd at least give the oil in the crankcase gasses more surface area to condense on. Plus every time you heard a funny noise coming from your motor you'd think it got loose and the oil pump's trying to pass it like a kidney stone. Ahh, the wonderful pucker factor.

  22. #22
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Mitch Wright View Post
    FYI if you plan to race the car in NASA or SCCA you might check the rule books..
    Well curses.

    Just checked the 'Prepared Class' sections of the SCCA Solo Rules and:
    17.10.K.2. The installation of any type of vent or breather on the engine is
    permitted. Crankcase, oiling system, breather, or catch tank evac-
    uation systems that are in any way connected to the exhaust sys-
    tem are prohibited.
    So that's right-out for me as I plan to run X Prepared. Glad someone reigned me in.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Bowling Green, KY
    Posts
    1,382
    Post Thanks / Like
    It was hard to see on our GT3 car which is not the case on the 818.

  24. #24
    Senior Member Xusia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stupid question #2: If the OEM separator is plumped into the turbo inlet (presumably because there is a vacuum there), why not just plumb an external AOS inline there? Seems like a lot less work, and you still get a vacuum to assist with drawing the air through the separator. What am I missing??

  25. #25
    Senior Member Rasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, USA
    Posts
    983
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Xusia View Post
    Stupid question #2: If the OEM separator is plumped into the turbo inlet (presumably because there is a vacuum there), why not just plumb an external AOS inline there?
    It's not a stupid question. That's probably exactly what I'm going to do now, seeing how the SCCA banned my idea long before I came up with it. I don't want the added expense or complexitiy of a seperate vacuum pump just for the crankcase so the only other easy source of vacuum is the turbo inlet pipe.


    I'll just run a quality AOS plumbed just like you described it. Something like the Moroso "Large Body" unit.

  26. #26
    fasterer and furiouser longislandwrx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    2,540
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Xusia View Post
    Stupid question #2: If the OEM separator is plumped into the turbo inlet (presumably because there is a vacuum there), why not just plumb an external AOS inline there? Seems like a lot less work, and you still get a vacuum to assist with drawing the air through the separator. What am I missing??
    That's how most of them work. Tying into the exhaust for vacuum just means you have zero chance that oil is going to be sucked beck into the engine.
    A well stocked beverage fridge is the key to any successful project.

  27. #27
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    Post Thanks / Like
    Not trying to rip on grimmspeed, but ive had their AOS in hand and the one offered fron S2 performance, and they are just about identical, except the price

  28. #28
    Senior Member StatGSR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Duluth, MN
    Posts
    443
    Post Thanks / Like
    to be fair, S2 did blatantly copy/steal the Grimmspeed AOS design. That said, i even find the $200 price of the S2 AOS to be completely offensive for what your getting.
    05 Outback XT - DD
    94 Integra GSR - Track Car
    97 Legacy Brighton - EG33 Swap Project
    03 Silverado 2500HD Duramax - Tow Rig
    97 Integra GS - Future Track Car

  29. #29
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    San Diego & Riverside CA
    Posts
    95
    Post Thanks / Like
    I just got a used/ like new Grimmspeed air oil separator for $150. I really like the simple design that returns the oil to the crankcase. Simple and no maintenance.

  30. #30
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    Post Thanks / Like
    Not sure of the validity of the argument, but I picked up the GS piece in the group buy when it first came out thru RS25.com, and members were stating that the S2 piece had been out before, and it does even come in the same packaging.

    Got my S2 on ebay for 164 including shipping to Hawaii

  31. #31
    Senior Member StatGSR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Duluth, MN
    Posts
    443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by ruckus racing View Post
    Not sure of the validity of the argument, but I picked up the GS piece in the group buy when it first came out thru RS25.com, and members were stating that the S2 piece had been out before, and it does even come in the same packaging.

    Got my S2 on ebay for 164 including shipping to Hawaii
    the GS unit was out before S2 unit, the S2 is a copy
    05 Outback XT - DD
    94 Integra GSR - Track Car
    97 Legacy Brighton - EG33 Swap Project
    03 Silverado 2500HD Duramax - Tow Rig
    97 Integra GS - Future Track Car

  32. #32
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    45
    Post Thanks / Like
    Well, they do come in the exact same packaging, with the exact same contents

  33. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    71
    Post Thanks / Like
    I went with a dual catch can setup made by saikou michi, had good reviews on the wrx forums. Here is a link to it
    http://www.saikoumichi.com/DC3_page.htm
    Price is reasonable and the quality is nice.

  34. #34
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    322
    Post Thanks / Like
    Can this thread and C Plavan's thread be combined so all this info is together?

  35. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    322
    Post Thanks / Like
    Here is some more Air Oil Separator information!!

  36. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    678
    Post Thanks / Like
    If anyone want a barely used GS OAS, let me know and I'll send it to your for $100. We went drysump on our R.

  37. #37
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like
    Retro, I'll take that AOS if it's still available.

  38. #38
    Senior Member FFRSpec72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    2,255
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by RetroRacing View Post
    If anyone want a barely used GS OAS, let me know and I'll send it to your for $100. We went drysump on our R.
    So I have checked with Perrin, Crawford, Element Tuning and ARE and all are in favor of still running a AOS with a dry sump, I know Leo (Green Center drive) has been doing this with good results
    Tony Nadalin
    2018 SOVREN Big Bore Champion
    2015 SCCA Oregon Region VP3 Champion
    2012 ICSCC ITE Class Champion
    FFR MkII Challenge Car, Spec Racer, Street Legal, SCCA, ICSCC and NASA Racing
    818R Build in progress

  39. #39
    Sgt.Gator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    1,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by FFRSpec72 View Post
    So I have checked with Perrin, Crawford, Element Tuning and ARE and all are in favor of still running a AOS with a dry sump, I know Leo (Green Center drive) has been doing this with good results
    Did they say why? What does an AOS + DS do that a DS doesn't already do?
    "Good Judgement comes from Experience. Experience comes from Bad Judgement"
    Owner: Colonel Red Racing
    eBAy Store: http://stores.ebay.com/colonelredracing
    818R ICSCC SPM
    2005 Subaru STI Race Car ICSCC ST and SPM
    Palatov DP4 - ICSCC Sports Racer

  40. #40
    Senior Member FFRSpec72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    2,255
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.Gator View Post
    Did they say why? What does an AOS + DS do that a DS doesn't already do?
    All claimed it reduces sludge build up as therev still will be bypass out of the vents, I would think that this would not apply to folks are running a closed vacuum system. which i'm not
    Tony Nadalin
    2018 SOVREN Big Bore Champion
    2015 SCCA Oregon Region VP3 Champion
    2012 ICSCC ITE Class Champion
    FFR MkII Challenge Car, Spec Racer, Street Legal, SCCA, ICSCC and NASA Racing
    818R Build in progress

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Stewart Transport

Visit our community sponsor