Boig Motorsports

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: Air Oil Separators

  1. #41
    Senior Member Bob_n_Cincy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Cincinnati OH
    Posts
    3,903
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by FFRSpec72 View Post
    So I have checked with Perrin, Crawford, Element Tuning and ARE and all are in favor of still running a AOS with a dry sump, I know Leo (Green Center drive) has been doing this with good results
    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt.Gator View Post
    Did they say why? What does an AOS + DS do that a DS doesn't already do?
    Quote Originally Posted by FFRSpec72 View Post
    All claimed it reduces sludge build up as therev still will be bypass out of the vents, I would think that this would not apply to folks are running a closed vacuum system. which i'm not
    This is strange that they still want an AOS.
    The dry sump tank is essentially a large AOS. The swirling air in the top of the dry sump tank separates the oil and air. The oil going to the bottom of the tank and the air going out the top of the tank to the valve cover ports. If there is extra air caused by blow-by, this goes to the small breather tank.

    I am not running a vacuum regulator on my system. I deleted my PCV System.
    I have no connection from crank case fumes to the intake track, so no oil/sludge can get to the intake track.
    Bob
    Last edited by Bob_n_Cincy; 10-27-2016 at 10:23 AM.
    818S #22 Candy Blue Frame, Front Gas Tank, 2.5L Turbo, Rear radiator, Shortened Transmission, Wookiee Compatible, Console mounted MR2 Shifter, Custom ECU panel, AWIC soon
    My Son Michael's Turbo ICE Build X22 http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...rts-818S-Build
    My Electric Supercar Build X21 (on hold until winter) http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...e-Build-Thread

  2. #42
    Senior Member FFRSpec72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Kirkland, WA
    Posts
    2,255
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob_n_Cincy View Post
    This is strange that they still want an AOS.
    The dry sump tank is essentially a large AOS. The swirling air in the top of the dry sump tank separates the oil and air. The oil going to the bottom of the tank and the air going out the top of the tank to the valve cover ports. If there is extra air caused by blow-by, this goes to the small breather tank.

    I am not running a vacuum regulator on my system. I deleted my PCV System.
    I have no connection from crank case fumes to the intake track, so no oil/sludge can get to the intake track.
    Bob
    The point is if you already have an AOS there is no need to remove it, I doubt if I did not have one I would go out and buy one
    Tony Nadalin
    2018 SOVREN Big Bore Champion
    2015 SCCA Oregon Region VP3 Champion
    2012 ICSCC ITE Class Champion
    FFR MkII Challenge Car, Spec Racer, Street Legal, SCCA, ICSCC and NASA Racing
    818R Build in progress

  3. #43
    Sgt.Gator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    1,652
    Post Thanks / Like
    I can think of two reasons to remove the AOS if you have a dry sump:

    1) You have to think thru how the gasses will flow with a DS +AOS. Normally a AOS uses Positive crankcase pressure + Inlet vacuum to move gasses out of the crankcase and thru the AOS. And the AOS can be hooked up in several different ways depending on if you keep the PCV. Just look at the Perrin installation document for examples of different setups. With a DS scavenge it's going to work quite differently. Be sure you understand the unintended consequences!

    2) An AOS creates several potential points of failure for oil leaks and vacuum leaks. Those leaks could be on the outside of the engine causing a fire, or inside the Inlet coating your TMIC/FMIC/AWIC with oil and causing detonation.

    On AOS's in General, the subject of this thread:

    As with most mods "it depends". There are endless versions of catch cans and AOS installs. Some are for pure street cars that have a lot of blow by on loosely built forged motors. Some are for track day cars that never go more than 20-25 minutes on a track. And some are for full race car applications. I have my opinions, YMMV, so here's my $.02:

    1) Street Car with oem block and typical stage 1-2 build. Stay OEM PCV. It works fine.

    2) Track car doing HPDE events of 25 minutes on an OEM block stay oem PCV. Check your inlet tract for excessive oil. (From MAF to Turbo, and in the TMIC or FMIC piping). My Grand Am Cup Subaru still had the factory PCV system and it worked fine. There was a small amount of oil in the intake tract, but not enough to worry about. My tuner, Cobb, recommended staying with the oem PCV during the restoration from 2006 specs to 2011. In their opinion the problems an AOS can cause outweigh the value on a stock block 300 HP engine. I never regretted that decision.
    If you have a lot of oil in your intake tract check over your PCV system closely for issues, replace PCV valve, if still a lot of oil go to #3.

    3) Track car doing HPDE on built forged block and/or you are having issues with oil in your intake tract, consider an AOS. I've looked closely at all of them. I had the Crawford AOS on my Spec B. Today I would go with the Perrin. KillerB has a new one but I know of no reviews yet. IAG also has a nice looking one: http://www.iagperformance.com/IAG-Co...g-eng-7251.htm

    4) Race car, as in dedicated to nothing but racing. Perrin AOS/IAG/KillerB/Crawford or Dry Sump. I personally skip straight to dry sump for all my race cars now, but I recognize that's very expensive.

    In 1-3 of the above if you don't have a bunch of oil in your intake tract or tmic/fmic piping stay with oem pcv.

    Remember an improperly configured catch can/AOS can be worse than an oem PCV! I think a Crawford AOS that had a pinched block feedback line contributed to my Spec B spun bearing, it at least caused a ton of oil in my intake tract. I mean a ton of oil!

    And the consensus from numerous folks is to stay away from the Grimmspeed AOS that goes in your oil fill tube if you are tracking your car. It may be ok on the street, but on a race track it's not.

    There's a monster thread about this at IWSTI, 172 pages. I've read the entire thing and came to the following conclusion: 1/2 of thread posters think AOS is great; 1/2 of posters think their AOS destroyed their engine.

    http://www.iwsti.com/forums/2-5-lite...ns-thread.html

    Great diagrams in the first post.
    "Good Judgement comes from Experience. Experience comes from Bad Judgement"
    Owner: Colonel Red Racing
    eBAy Store: http://stores.ebay.com/colonelredracing
    818R ICSCC SPM
    2005 Subaru STI Race Car ICSCC ST and SPM
    Palatov DP4 - ICSCC Sports Racer

  4. #44
    Senior Member SixStar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Westminster, MD
    Posts
    638
    Post Thanks / Like
    The 818R has a Crawford on it that will be replaced with an IAG Race AOS soon.

    Never had any issues with the Crawfish TBH.
    Owner/builder - AEM Intakes 818R #85

  5. #45
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    32
    Post Thanks / Like
    My .02 from owning my 05 STi-swapped bugeye, I decided on the Moroso dual-can setup. It was recommended to me by a Subaru master tech buddy who had a hand in designing the setup. Worked flawlessly and keeps both sides of the crankcase ventilation system clean. It will find its way onto my 818C once I get everything together.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FFMetal

Visit our community sponsor