Boig Motorsports

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: UCA mounting points, Ride height vs front uca angle (Gen I)

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like

    UCA mounting points, Ride height vs front uca angle (Gen I)

    Hey,
    Kind of resurrecting my hibernating build... Again.

    So, looking at relocating mounting points of the front UCA's.
    I know a lot of guys slot the holes in the frame tabs to the back to get more static caster. Only by eye balling, I have very low caster w/stock mounting points. So, obviously that's a good approach.
    How much? Relocate backwards much as I can until I hit the frame (and then some) I figure.
    I also have Crash's lugs at the LCA's to (one benefit of them) be able to push the LCA upright mounting point forward.

    Now, going to static camber and camber gain.

    So, looking at camber gain, my gut feeling is that I want my UCA's angled slightly up static (inside to out) for cornering? I mean, as the outer side compresses its camber increases with body roll and as the inner side "lifts", the inside camber decreases and lean into the corner as well. Or is the unequal length control arm geometry enough? Is optimum parallel with ground UCA's at full droop? Maybe I need to get a suspension geometry sw package...

    I'm thinking moving the UCA mounting points back and slightly lower would be beneficial?
    (Depending on selected front ride height and choice of wheel/tire height of course)

    I'm guessing caster gain (or anti dive) by angling the UCA mounting points is not really needed/wanted with the "light" front end?

    My racecar theory is lacking, but if I'm cutting up the frame I figure I should get some input.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Roger Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Caldwell (near Boise) Idaho
    Posts
    237
    Post Thanks / Like
    I moved my Gen I front upper mounts 1" rearward for more caster which turned out well.
    I tried moving them down for more camber recovery, big mistake. I experimented both up and down from the stock height. The bump steer went crazy. I went back to stock height.
    Just an old man with a great hobby

  3. #3
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    It is interesting that the C5 UCAs are canted, while the GTM's are horizontal...
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Posts
    67
    Post Thanks / Like
    If the rear of the UCA is lower than the front, it should give some anti-dive. Alternately the rear of the LCA can be higher than the front with the same anti-dive effect. IIRC Carroll Smith covered that in Tune To Win. Herb Adams covers it in Chassis Engineering. As you noted you also get Caster Gain. I suppose that is good for the loaded, outside tire but would be caster loss for the inside tire. Our cars are so low I don't know how much weight transfers unless you are running R compound tires.
    Keep us posted.
    Ken

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    Just so you are aware, one of the things we tried recently on the FFR PDG GTM race car was to move the rear UCA mount to the bottom of the tab to give the car a little more front anti squat. It seems to have worked nicely.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Southern Illinois
    Posts
    67
    Post Thanks / Like
    Crash,
    Are you messing with us? "front anti squat"
    Ken

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Cattrax View Post
    Crash,
    Are you messing with us? "front anti squat"
    Ken
    Sorry, anti dive, if you prefer.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

  8. #8
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    So is there a consensus on the most ideal position of the UCA? No one has ever moved the lower control arm, have they (other than Crash - I believe you widened the front track)?
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Houston TX
    Posts
    374
    Post Thanks / Like
    I have a Gen 1 and with the use of Mike's shims and adjustable upper control arms from the other handy Forum Mike, have ample adjustability with the stock upper front control arm locations and the FF5 bump steer kit.
    Bump steer is < 1/8" over the length of suspension travel @ 45ft using a laser level.
    All wheels with the exception of the drivers side rear are very close to the center of the wheel well, (body symmetry issue).
    My settings as they were the last time that I was on the rack were, (before I tweaked them some after driving on the track):
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Cheers,
    Dave

    GTM # 294 Build Start Date 10/12/2009,
    2000 C5 Donor, LS-1 Twin Turbo, AC/Heat, G50-20.02 6 speed, Brandwood Cable shifter
    Build site. http://s679.photobucket.com/albums/vv153/dfraser/

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by beeman View Post
    So is there a consensus on the most ideal position of the UCA? No one has ever moved the lower control arm, have they (other than Crash - I believe you widened the front track)?
    Just for clarity, the front LCAs are all stock positions as from FFR, but we changed the mounting points of the rear LCAs to DECREASE the amount of anti squat that is in the car as from FFR. The front UCA mounts we slotted to get more caster and camber, and then placed the rear mount on the bottom of the tab and the front mount on the top of the tab so the front UCAs would provide increased antidive. The rear UCA mounts are all stock, but I made custom adjustable UCAs for the rear. The car is standard 74" wide and with a 100" wheel base, IIRC the exact stock numbers correctly. We use all stock C5/C6 suspension components. This is for the FFR PDG GTM race car only. The GTMR, which is the car I am building from the ground up uses proprietary suspension that has no common parts with an FFR GTM or a C5, other than using C5/C6 ZR1 hubs. It is 78" X 106" at the wheels.
    Last edited by crash; 02-01-2017 at 11:14 AM.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like
    Hi again,
    Lot's of good info, thanks guys!
    Not being a racer/race engineer for the past 20+ years makes one realize the more you learn about suspension geometry theory (and above all, practice) the less you know :-)
    And when you think you're ontop of the left front end, there's always total vehicle dynamics and then we go into airflow/downforce...
    It's really an interesting subject though, and I guess the best way to learn is to get into it in real time.
    To me that means get it close by listening to awesome input and make things adjustable within reason. Also I might need a reality check since it's not a track sprint car I'm after but a track capable street car which complicates or possibly simplifies things.
    So, I need to think afor a bit about front UCA mounting points and adjustability. Moving them back is a clear target, I think rotating the pins to Corvette style allowing for shimming and somehow provide adjustability up/down at each point (anti dive) would be great.

    From the little that's been revealed I guess Crash's GTMR build front suspension package is a lot more sexy, like this BMW M1 Sauber look alike build that I came across at a Swedish racing forum: So cool!
    2016-11-08-20-58-22_20161106_154446.jpg

  12. #12
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    Pushrod suspension! I'll be impressed if you pull that off. I've toyed with the idea, but the GTM setup seems awfully good, I'd probably really screw up the car
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yeah, and the high strength sheet metal one off uprights fitting within fractions of an inch into the rims selected. Also housing reluctor wheels for like Bosch M4 motorsport abs. Just laser cut pieces of steel engineered into awsomness. In someones garage. I should stop this and take up knitting.
    This is going the extra mile to get not only adjustability of camber and caster but scrub, ackerman and what not to where you want it!
    Maybe we all should just cut our front ends off and ask for a kit :-)

    Oh forgot again, not a racer. Street and track.

    /Thomas

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    You mean something like this...

    IMG00902-20160529-1132.jpg

    I am just building the jig plates here so they all come out the same, but those are the sheet metal uprights I think you are talking about. Mine have the option of moving brake cooling air THROUGH them so as to help keep the hub with wheel speed sensor cool.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like
    Aha!
    So there's some progress on the GTMR Looking good.

    Been a bit distracted lately as I started to look into Hp Tuners and Gen IV ecm Virtual VE tuning. You really need to be a jack of all trades with this project...

    Going back to the front UCA's, someone here or on 'the other forum' converted to corvette style UCA mounting (pins rotated 90deg.) using 'slugs' with different offsets for mounting point heights. Can't seem to find that thread. I think that's the way to go...

    So. Kickoff soon.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Roger Reid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Caldwell (near Boise) Idaho
    Posts
    237
    Post Thanks / Like
    If anyone is interested, Joel on the other forum, did some interesting front upper control arms and mounts. He hasn't posted for several years. Here is a link to his photobucket. http://s926.photobucket.com/user/jch...l?sort=6&o=153
    Just an old man with a great hobby

  17. #17
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like
    Exactly, Joels inserts with offset holes would be a wish come true! In the frame bracket it could be incorporated but int the UCA using the stock upper arms and pins, not so much. I'm also adapting my mounts for the AFE/Pfadt sperical bearing "bushings". They look very much adopted to be mounted in the C5 stock orientation (very littlte marerial outside of the bolt through mounting holes) if that makes sense.

    So, if I was to cut the tabs off and make new mounts attaching the UCA pins @ 90 deg (Corvette original orientation)...
    That gives me roughly 18mm from frame to pin mounting surface to play with. (UCA hits frame)

    A base mounting plate welded to the frame and bolted in tabs with offset mouting holes for the UCA pin bolts could maybe work?
    I've been skething a bit in Onshape CAD.
    UCA.jpg

    Don't know if it shows, but I think it could work OK. Need to go to high strength steel for the gripping theads to be stronger than bolt...

  18. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Stockholm/Sweden/Europe
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like
    Tmzand, nice to see you are back on track.
    Would be nice to have a fellow GTM on the streets, I think I would take a trip over to you this summer with the GTM, it needs to be some kmīs on my car.

    Looks like a good solution on the UCAīs, Let me know if you need some help fabricating your parts.

    Regards

    Thomas

  19. #19
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    Is this basically what you did Crash? Move the rear part of the A-arm to the bottom of the mounts? Then add a couple of washers underneath the most forward bolt to take the twist out of the front bushing?
    I'm really considering moving the upper mounts back 1" for more caster (7ish degrees), should I build this geometry into the "fix"?
    Thanks

    Last edited by beeman; 03-12-2017 at 01:27 PM.
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  20. #20
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    Actually, it looks like you can only move about 1/2" before hitting the spring... Are people moving the upper shock mounts too? Or running inverted shocks? I don't think I'm supposed to run these inverted (black Koni) ?

    Last edited by beeman; 03-12-2017 at 01:53 PM.
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  21. #21
    Senior Member beeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,485
    Post Thanks / Like
    Or can someone just sell me some adjustable UCAs like I have on my roadster?
    MK3.1 2004 Mach 1 donor. ABS, PS, TC.
    GTM #304 LPE 525hp LS3
    2000 C5 Lingenfelter LS1@489hp
    1999 Corvette FRC/Z06 track car

  22. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    12
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thomas, yes back at it. Long way to go. Thanks for the offer, and yes please come by if you're in the neighborhood!

    Beeman, there is a "Mike" who put a SPC based adjustable Uca kit together. Looks like a great option. Check out Fraser D's track thread on "the other forum". Near the top. Has a couple of pics.

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by beeman View Post
    Is this basically what you did Crash?
    Yep.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Brown County Customs

Visit our community sponsor