Very Cool Parts

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Technical Alert: Safety Notice Affects '33 Hot Rods and Mk4 Roadsters

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Webmaster, FFR
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Middleboro, MA
    Posts
    1,835
    Post Thanks / Like

    Technical Alert: Safety Notice Affects '33 Hot Rods and Mk4 Roadsters

    We have become aware of a two separate customers who have had fasteners break. The fastener is part of the Hot Rod and Mk4 spindle assembly and it attaches the steering arm to the spindle. This is a serious concern. If you have a Factory Five Mk4 Roadster (complete kit only) or '33 Hot Rod, please stop driving your vehicle and read the following information.



    The Factory Five part number is 33610. This is an M12-1.75 x 50mm long button head zinc colored bolt grade 12.9. The fasteners of concern are a silver zinc color and were used starting May 2009.



    If you have a Mk4 complete kit or a 33 Hot rod do not drive your car.

    Actions we are taking:

    1. We will be sending All Mk4 complete kit and 33 Hot rod customers hex head replacement bolts as soon as possible (days, not weeks).

    2. While these fasteners are correct for the application, we do not know why they have failed. We have sent samples to an independent testing lab, but are proceeding to replace all fasteners as quickly as possible.

    3. We are posting this notice on our website, customer discussions forums, our Facebook page, and sending certified mail notices to customers immediately.

    Our number one concern is your safety. If you have any concerns, questions or feel that you don’t understand this message, please e-mail or call FFR’s tech department at 508-291-3443.

    UPDATE: Patti in purchasing and I have been working hard to get the new fasteners and instructions ready to send to all of those who may be affected by this tech alert. Everything was sent out on 8/18.

    Factory Five Racing, Inc

  2. #2
    Senior Member BigLeo69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    st. louis, MO
    Posts
    185
    Post Thanks / Like
    shouldn't the bolt in question be or have a shoulder on it, and a fine thread would be better, looks like there would be room just for a hex-head and a locking shoulder nut in the grade 8 strength. "86" the nylock (should be of higher grade)
    Mk 3.1 #6945

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,961
    Post Thanks / Like
    Can you tell me what the difference is between "grade 8" and "12.9"?

    Only reason I ask is that I always thought that grade 12.9 was as high or higher in strength than a "grade 8".

    BTW- My guess on the failure issue is that the bolts are being put in tension, as opposed to shear, when the load is being applied, and if the bolts are over tightened to begin with, then it doesn't take much to push them over the edge. Quite a lot of force can be generated from trying to turn the wheels at times.
    Last edited by crash; 02-28-2011 at 05:24 PM.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,961
    Post Thanks / Like
    "ISO metric materials are Class 12.9 (applies to hex socket head cap screws, equivalant to ANSI 'heat treated alloy steel' Rc38-45); Class 10.9 (applies to hex head cap screws, equivalant to Grade 8); Class 8.8 (applies to hex head cap screws, equivalant to Grade 5)For tensile strengths over 180m psi uts, special manufacture in a variety of available materials and conditions are the norm.Jim DisharoonTranSpec Fasteners, Inc."

    Yep, looks like the grade 12.9 is actually a higher strength bolt than the grade 8 or 10.9 fasteners. Again, it's my feeling that the spindle design along with possible overtightening is what is leading to this issue.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,961
    Post Thanks / Like
    I guess in the bigger picture, since the spindle, or what I commonly call the "upright", isn't symetrical, the question I would pose is why isn't the steering arm part of the main piece? Is this upright used in varying locations where the steering arm is different depending upon location/application?

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like
    Why would a bolt without a shank ever be used for a steering application. Or any other application where high strength is needed for that matter?

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    1,961
    Post Thanks / Like
    Because many times a short bolt is not readily available that includes a shank, maybe?

    I will say that when a bolt is used exclusively in tension, that it really makes no difference if there is any shoulder or shank section to the bolt, so in this application, it would make little to no difference.
    www.myraceshop.com

    GTM solution kits
    Corvette and Race parts

  8. #8
    Director of R&D, FFR Jim Schenck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wareham
    Posts
    444
    Post Thanks / Like
    Steering arms are seperate pieces so the spindle can be used on the 33 (rear steer) and the MKIV (front steer) This also give the added benefit of more adjustability. Shimming the arm can modify ackerman and bumpsteer, or steering quickness can be altered by machining shorter/longer replacements.
    Jim Schenck
    Factory Five Racing

  9. #9
    33 Hot Rod Builder geoffav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Enterprise, AL
    Posts
    458
    Post Thanks / Like
    Haha, you're right. The funny thing is I'm around the stuff all day long. I would have more time for the car if I won't hanging around aviation maintenance. Work really gets in the way of the finer things in life.

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Murrieta, CA
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like
    Sent out on 8/18?? I have a 33 complete kit (#271), and I got no notice or parts. Is this an old outdated thread? The posts are early this year??

  11. #11
    Senior Member E-Ticket Ride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Huntington Beach, California
    Posts
    132
    Post Thanks / Like
    I just happened upon this thread. I believe that depending on when your kit was shipped this may be OBE (overtaken by events) and they have sent you the proper replacement as part of the original shipment. Given the importance of this I would recommend a call to FFR to double check.
    JMO - ICBW
    CL
    Confidence: The feeling you have before you truly understand the situation. FFR 7652 Mk IV Base Kit w/IRS: ordered 10/19/2011; Arrived 11/19/2011. Coyote, Trans & headers Installed 9/11/17. First Start 12/19/17, First Go-cart 3/2/18. Aligned and go-karting. Working the interior now. Happy customer of FFR, North RaceCars, Forte's, and Breeze.
    Chris Lewis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Martin's Dent and Collision Shop

Visit our community sponsor