Boig Motorsports

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 2012 mk4 rear suspension options

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like

    2012 mk4 rear suspension options

    I currently have a 2012 MK4 with 4 link, donor parts. I don't see ffr offering any IRS other than the new 2015 option. I don't believe this option will work on my frame. Do I have an option to retrofit an IRS or should I just go with the retrofit of 3 link option? Third choice is simply upgrading all the shocks to adustable coilovers?
    Most of my driving involves spirited motoring in the mountains of WV, dodging dear. In addition, a couple autocross events per year.

  2. #2
    Senior Member edwardb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lake Orion, Michigan
    Posts
    10,577
    Post Thanks / Like
    The frame you have is either solid axle or IRS. Whether the previous IRS version which was selling in the 2012 timeframe, or the newer 2015+ Mustang option sold now. If you can fabricate and weld, it's possible to make the swap. It's been done. But there's nothing from Factory Five that directly supports it. Your donor 4-link would be way better with aftermarket parts including coilovers. Switching to 3-link would be better yet.
    Build 1: Mk3 Roadster #5125. Sold 11/08/2014. Build 2: Mk4 Roadster #7750. Sold 04/10/2017. Build Thread
    Build 3: Mk4 Roadster 20th Anniversary #8674. Sold 09/07/2020. Build Thread and Video. Build 4: Gen 3 Type 65 Coupe #59. Gen 3 Coyote. Legal 03/04/2020. Build Thread and Video
    Build 5: 35 Hot Rod Truck #138. LS3 and 4L65E auto. Rcvd 01/05/2021. Legal 04/20/2023. Build Thread. Sold 11/9/2023.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Gordon Levy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maricopa AZ
    Posts
    1,277
    Post Thanks / Like
    My 5 link is the best option if you plan on keeping the live axle.
    99/2000 NASA PSO Champion-2005 west coast FFR challenge series Champions
    Sponsor Tony B's 2007 ST2 National Championship
    2009 NASA TTC runner up-2010 NASA TTB runner up

  4. #4
    Senior Member edwardb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lake Orion, Michigan
    Posts
    10,577
    Post Thanks / Like
    X2 on Gordon's 5-link. It's a great choice as well. Had it on my #7750 build and was very happy with it.

    Build 1: Mk3 Roadster #5125. Sold 11/08/2014. Build 2: Mk4 Roadster #7750. Sold 04/10/2017. Build Thread
    Build 3: Mk4 Roadster 20th Anniversary #8674. Sold 09/07/2020. Build Thread and Video. Build 4: Gen 3 Type 65 Coupe #59. Gen 3 Coyote. Legal 03/04/2020. Build Thread and Video
    Build 5: 35 Hot Rod Truck #138. LS3 and 4L65E auto. Rcvd 01/05/2021. Legal 04/20/2023. Build Thread. Sold 11/9/2023.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    Right now I'm leaning towards the 3 link because of the Challenge series history of durability. In addition, I wouldn't trust my welding on the rear end of a fast moving car. On one of my slow moving tractors , sure.
    Honestly, I forgot about the 5 link option.
    Will I be able to install the 5 link with the body still on the car? Any welding or fabrication needed for the 5 link?
    Thanks for all the input. You guys have me thinking.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Gordon Levy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maricopa AZ
    Posts
    1,277
    Post Thanks / Like
    The reason we designed the 5 link is because we broke the 3 link several times. On the MarkIV it need to be welded in and can be done with the body on but it takes a bit of work.
    99/2000 NASA PSO Champion-2005 west coast FFR challenge series Champions
    Sponsor Tony B's 2007 ST2 National Championship
    2009 NASA TTC runner up-2010 NASA TTB runner up

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Stewart Transport

Visit our community sponsor