FormaCars

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: Spring rates, higher rate in the front?

  1. #41
    Senior Member Frank818's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    QC, Canada
    Posts
    5,732
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wleehendrick View Post
    How about the S? I built to the manual: 350F, 275R. Don't tell me I need to swap them!
    Yeah about the S?
    Anyone called FFR yet?
    Frank
    818 chassis #181 powered by a '93 VW VR6 Turbo GT3582R
    Go-karted Aug 5, 2016 - Then May 19+21, 2017
    Tracked May 27/July 26, 2017
    Build time before being driveable on Sep 27, 2019: over 6000h
    Build Completed Winter 2021

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Vacaville, CA
    Posts
    157
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think I was under the naive understanding that you want spring stiffness to be linear with weight distribution.

    Assuming the same control arm length from pivot to lower coilover mounts and the same angle spring angle on the front and rear of a vehicle, is there ever a case when you would want to run stiffer front springs on a rear biased car or stiffer rear springs on a front biased car?

  3. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Logan, UT
    Posts
    242
    Post Thanks / Like
    a while ago I read a thread on some MR2Spyder forums. from a guy who did AutoX pretty serious. his theory was that the end of the vehicle with the lesser weight, needed more spring rate so that while turning that "axle" would work as hard as the axle holding the weight. because the end holding the weight would want to "tilt" and the end with less weight would want to hold the chassis from tilting, therefore more force would be transmitted to the ground through those tires. Resulting in more even tire temperatures and more balance.


    this said, I am NOT a Suspension Guru, though, the physics seem sound to me.

  4. #44
    Director of R&D, FFR Jim Schenck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wareham
    Posts
    444
    Post Thanks / Like
    818 Springs rates that come in the kit:

    818S 350# front, 275# rear
    818R 300# front, 500# rear

    If you are running an S with lots of aero (not the street splitter and spoiler but something more) then we can switch out springs, and same goes if you are running an R without aero. Comparing the rates to other cars won't work because there are so many other variables, motion ratio in particular being one of the biggest.
    Jim Schenck
    Factory Five Racing

  5. #45
    Senior Member metros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    1,064
    Post Thanks / Like
    A lot of us are building an s with r suspension and r aero. What are you recommending for spring rates in that scenario?

  6. #46
    Director of R&D, FFR Jim Schenck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wareham
    Posts
    444
    Post Thanks / Like
    If it is the full R aero with the splitter, diffuser, and the rear wing then you can switch to the R rates (and I would switch the shocks to the mono-tubes from the R as well). But if it is still mainly a street car I would find a more middle of the road set-up. I would start with just flipping the front and rear springs on the stock shocks if you want to maintain the ride. I would only run it that way if I had the rear wing or possibly if it was an autocross only car. If it is a serious track car though I would up the rates to compensate for the downforce at higher speeds.
    Jim Schenck
    Factory Five Racing

  7. #47
    Senior Member metros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    1,064
    Post Thanks / Like
    Correct I'll be using all the r aero pieces and r monotube shocks. So flipping the springs front to rear would provide a more compliant ride for the street?

    I think I'll start with the r recommendations and then switch if it's too much on the street.

  8. #48
    Director of R&D, FFR Jim Schenck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wareham
    Posts
    444
    Post Thanks / Like
    Flipping the springs won't help with the ride but will help with the balance of the car. Having the wing in the back will make the car understeer so switching to higher rate rear than front will get the car back closer to neutral.
    Jim Schenck
    Factory Five Racing

  9. #49
    Senior Member D Clary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Santa Rosa CA
    Posts
    407
    Post Thanks / Like
    At what speed do you think this aero stuff is going to make a difference? I don't know about all autocross but our course usually limits top speeds to under 60 mph. The large rear wing may do something if it is installed with a steeper angle but I don't see the splitter doing much going into a corner at 40mph.

  10. #50
    Senior Member Frank818's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    QC, Canada
    Posts
    5,732
    Post Thanks / Like
    Joe @ FFR confirmed on the S it's 350 front and 275 rear.
    Frank
    818 chassis #181 powered by a '93 VW VR6 Turbo GT3582R
    Go-karted Aug 5, 2016 - Then May 19+21, 2017
    Tracked May 27/July 26, 2017
    Build time before being driveable on Sep 27, 2019: over 6000h
    Build Completed Winter 2021

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Martin's Dent and Collision Shop

Visit our community sponsor