Boig Motorsports

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  3
Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: 1995 and older 302 question

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like

    1995 and older 302 question

    I have a 1995 mustang 302 with a auto atm but will be swapping it out with a tko 500 or a t5 trans. My question is is the older 302 good in a roaster or try harder and buy a new engine? Should I keep it efi or swap to carb for a affordable price? I'm worried that the car wont have enough power to be fun.

    Right now the car has cobra upper and lower manifolds, 70mm throttle body, bbk intake, and bbk headers, and under drive pulleys. Also is Bama tuned with 24# injectors.

    Thanks guys

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bourne-Cape Cod, MA
    Posts
    808
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    I have a 1995 mustang 302 with a auto atm but will be swapping it out with a tko 500 or a t5 trans. My question is is the older 302 good in a roaster or try harder and buy a new engine? Should I keep it efi or swap to carb for a affordable price? I'm worried that the car wont have enough power to be fun.

    Right now the car has cobra upper and lower manifolds, 70mm throttle body, bbk intake, and bbk headers, and under drive pulleys. Also is Bama tuned with 24# injectors.

    Thanks guys

    This all depends on what you want. Sounds just about right to me...

    Unless of course you can afford a Coyote!

    My MKIII I built in 06 has about the same set up and has 42000 miles of pure fun on it.
    FFinisher/AKA RE63

  3. #3
    Seasoned Citizen NAZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    "The High Country", beautiful Flagstaff, AZ
    Posts
    2,443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Enough power? There is never enough power, but when you think have too much that's when you know you're getting close to enough.

    I recommend you go with a crate engine -- the biggest, most powerful you can afford. Don't let others tell you that's too much; that skinny pedal on the right is the power modulator. Once you learn how to use it you will never have too much power. And you can't build a HP engine for less than you can buy a crate engine with a warranty.
    Last edited by NAZ; 07-23-2019 at 10:27 AM.
    Dart Little M 406" SBC 800 HP N/A & 1,100 HP on nitrous, 2-spd Powerglide with trans brake, 6,000 RPM stall converter, narrowed Moser 88 3.90:1 spool with 35-spline gun-drilled axles & Torino bearings, custom parallel four-link, custom tube chassis & roll cage NHRA certified for 8.5-sec (only two FFR Hot Rods have this cert).

    33 Hot Rod Super Pro Drag Racer Build: 33 HR NHRA Cert Roll Cage Build

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    223
    Post Thanks / Like
    I have a 1991 302 with 1993 cobra intake and 70mm BBK T/B. Air Mass, fuel injectors, headers and heads are stock. I am very happy with power for a strictly street car. My engine also came from an ATM car but I used a T5. One thing I found for the 1991 is that the flywheel on an ATM car doesn’t have the same number of teeth as the manual so if you ever have to replace the starter motor you will need one for ATM.
    Phil: FFR 3121, Frame #2050, Mk 1.5, built 2002, 1991 donor with Blueprint 302 long block and 1993 Cobra intake, BBK 70mm T/B, no smog, power steering, T-5 and 3.55 rear.

  5. #5
    Not a waxer Jeff Kleiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bloomington, Indiana
    Posts
    8,000
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by FFinisher View Post
    This all depends on what you want. Sounds just about right to me...

    Unless of course you can afford a Coyote!

    My MKIII I built in 06 has about the same set up and has 42000 miles of pure fun on it.
    Yep! FFinisher Ron and I are in complete agreement on this. Although we've done 60+ cars between us our own personal roadsters are powered by moderately built EFI 5.0 Windsors much like what you describe. We're both big believers in the Coyote but it's hard to make any argument against the little 5.0s...or as he and I like to call them "the old reliables". You can beat on them like a borrowed mule, have enough fun to scare yourself into wetting your pants then put it away without so much as an apology for 6 months and when you come back to it just turn the key and do it all over again. Still a big winner in the bang for the buck game.

    Jeff

  6. Likes Geoff H liked this post
  7. #6
    Senior Member rich grsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    O'Fallon, MO
    Posts
    3,068
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    I have a 1995 mustang 302 with a auto atm but will be swapping it out with a tko 500 or a t5 trans. My question is is the older 302 good in a roaster or try harder and buy a new engine? Should I keep it efi or swap to carb for a affordable price? I'm worried that the car wont have enough power to be fun.

    Right now the car has cobra upper and lower manifolds, 70mm throttle body, bbk intake, and bbk headers, and under drive pulleys. Also is Bama tuned with 24# injectors.

    Thanks guys
    Is that a serious question? It was fun in a Mustang, now you've just dropped over a 1000 #'s, more than enough. I just can't agree with the idea you can't have enough power, even 300 hp will get these cars in serous danger if you aren't careful. Sure an experienced race driver can handle extreme power, but not the average guy, one second of "hey watch this" and it's all over.

  8. #7
    Senior Member ztoolman44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Summerland, BC
    Posts
    175
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Kleiner View Post
    Yep! FFinisher Ron and I are in complete agreement on this. Although we've done 60+ cars between us our own personal roadsters are powered by moderately built EFI 5.0 Windsors much like what you describe. We're both big believers in the Coyote but it's hard to make any argument against the little 5.0s...or as he and I like to call them "the old reliables". You can beat on them like a borrowed mule, have enough fun to scare yourself into wetting your pants then put it away without so much as an apology for 6 months and when you come back to it just turn the key and do it all over again. Still a big winner in the bang for the buck game.

    Jeff
    Refreshing to know I'm not the only one. I'm building mine to drive and want reliability as much as fun. The thought of being able to pick up common parts anywhere I go is comforting as well.

  9. #8
    mburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Punta Gorda FL
    Posts
    1,146
    Post Thanks / Like
    My ol' Mk1 is fun, (see signature) but with the stock intake, cam and heads, I'm finding I want a little more. The forum has given me great advice on how to get the extra ~75 horses or so I'm looking for. Speaking only for myself, with my current skill set and how I drive my car, most likely anything over 300 hp is wasted power.
    Mark
    Mk1, Frame #1929 Complete restoration/upgrade. BP 347 with Edelbrock PF4 439/420. 4 link with coilovers. 8.8 3.55, 15” Halibrand, New beefed up T5 w/short throw shifter, Power 4 wheel disc brakes, Custom original style steering wheel, shaft and boss, Heat/AC, Heated seats, PPW wipers w/washers, Forte’s throttle linkage, RT trunk hoop mod, Pusher cooling fans, full LED lighting, custom headrests, 5 point seat belts with sub pass through, Speedhut GPS gauges, battery drop box in trunk, LED courtesy lights, Breeze trunk cubby kit.

  10. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tybee Island, GA
    Posts
    505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Hi JS Fords Only,

    I built mine as a cruiser, and have a stock '95 302 in mine. Changed the cam to a E303 and added the carb intake with the fitech for the "classic" look. because I was swapping out all work parts, I went with the front dress of a '93 302 (per recommendation of Dougherty) for ease of parts availability. My Car is a LOT of fun for me. I guess it depends on what you're use to. I don't do burn outs, or crazy stuff. But I LOVE 2nd Gear or third gear on an on ramp, and it pushes me in the back of the seat.

    Rich is correct, that if it was enough for a Mustang GT, that taking 1,000 lbs off is even more fun!

    PICS
    Dave
    Mk 3.1 - #6882 - 5.0L 302 - FiTech EFI - 3-Link - 3.08 Ratio - 15" Wheels
    Greenhorn and doing the best I can
    My photos are at: My Flickr acct
    Videos are at: YouTube Videos

  11. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DadofThree View Post
    Hi JS Fords Only,

    I built mine as a cruiser, and have a stock '95 302 in mine. Changed the cam to a E303 and added the carb intake with the fitech for the "classic" look. because I was swapping out all work parts, I went with the front dress of a '93 302 (per recommendation of Dougherty) for ease of parts availability. My Car is a LOT of fun for me. I guess it depends on what you're use to. I don't do burn outs, or crazy stuff. But I LOVE 2nd Gear or third gear on an on ramp, and it pushes me in the back of the seat.

    Rich is correct, that if it was enough for a Mustang GT, that taking 1,000 lbs off is even more fun!

    PICS
    How much money do u think u have put into your 302 to turn it into a fitech top end and do you think it was work the cost since u already had a topend? Thanks

  12. Likes Derald Rice liked this post
  13. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like
    So since you have done so many of these cars with a old school 302. is there anything that you would change or have changed with your experience over the years with these engines? Just curious if there are any parts I should start to look at buying. Or something I should do when I have the engine out of the car? Thanks

    Engine has 148k miles
    Last edited by JS Fords only; 07-23-2019 at 03:02 PM.

  14. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tybee Island, GA
    Posts
    505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    How much money do u think u have put into your 302 to turn it into a fitech top end and do you think it was work the cost since u already had a topend? Thanks
    I would have needed to go with new injectors, but could have reused the intake. I was changing everything out anyway.

    Fitech 400 hp - $795 before $75 rebate
    Edelbrock RPM - $196
    Scott Drake Cobra Air Cleaner - $50

    Fittings and EFI hose:
    EAR-AT165056ERLTUBE ADAPTER turns 5/16"tube to 6AN male summit racing $10.74 1 $10.74
    EAR-AT165064ERLTUBE ADAPTERturns 1/4"tube to 6AN male summit racing $10.82 1 $10.82
    FRA-200106-BLSTR PUSH LOCK END BLK summit racing $3.97 2 $7.94
    FRA-204506-BL45 PUSH LOCK END BLK summit racing $13.97 2 $27.94
    FRA-873006PUSH LOCK HOSE summit racing $8.97 2 $17.94


    I stayed with a stock in tank fuel pump

    Pics of Upper Intake with Fitech

    IMG_1969 by D. R., on Flickr
    20170513_195955 by D. R., on Flickr
    Last edited by DadofThree; 07-23-2019 at 03:25 PM.
    Dave
    Mk 3.1 - #6882 - 5.0L 302 - FiTech EFI - 3-Link - 3.08 Ratio - 15" Wheels
    Greenhorn and doing the best I can
    My photos are at: My Flickr acct
    Videos are at: YouTube Videos

  15. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by DadofThree View Post
    I would have needed to go with new injectors, but could have reused the intake. I was changing everything out anyway.

    Fitech 400 hp - $795 before $75 rebate
    Edelbrock RPM - $196
    Scott Drake Cobra Air Cleaner - $50

    Fittings and EFI hose:
    EAR-AT165056ERLTUBE ADAPTER turns 5/16"tube to 6AN male summit racing $10.74 1 $10.74
    EAR-AT165064ERLTUBE ADAPTERturns 1/4"tube to 6AN male summit racing $10.82 1 $10.82
    FRA-200106-BLSTR PUSH LOCK END BLK summit racing $3.97 2 $7.94
    FRA-204506-BL45 PUSH LOCK END BLK summit racing $13.97 2 $27.94
    FRA-873006PUSH LOCK HOSE summit racing $8.97 2 $17.94


    I stayed with a stock in tank fuel pump

    Pics of Upper Intake with Fitech

    IMG_1969 by D. R., on Flickr
    20170513_195955 by D. R., on Flickr
    That looks so clean. So u got to keep your lower Intake? When u do the fitech u no longer need to run a wire harness right? I so love the before and after pic of your engine. Do you have a picture of it in your car?

    Also do you think you made more or less hp and does the fitech learn on it's own or do u need to tune it? Sorry alot of questions but thank you

  16. #14

    Super Moderator
    Ray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    La Mesa, California
    Posts
    1,249
    Post Thanks / Like
    I've got a 1972- 302 with a 1965 Offenhauser intake and a Holly Street Avenger carb. More then enough power to scare the crap out of you and your passenger if you don't know how to drive.

    Ray
    I'm not getting gray, I'm adding chrome....

    “Under-steer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and over-steer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car. Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall and torque is how far you take the wall with you.”
    -- Jacques Schnauzee "World Famous Racecar Driver"

    "If you can make black marks on a straight from the time you turn out of a corner until the braking point of the next turn, then you have enough horsepower."--Mark Donohue

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tybee Island, GA
    Posts
    505
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    That looks so clean. So u got to keep your lower Intake?
    It's not clean anymore.
    No, The Edelbrock RPM Carb Intake is the lower intake that I am using. It replaced the Ford EFI Lower Intake.

    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    When u do the fitech u no longer need to run a wire harness right?
    Depends on what you're using. If you're using the OEM Ford harness, I'm afraid I cannot help. I used the Ron Frances wiring harness and tied the Fitech into it. (SEE ATTACHMENT FOR WIRING)

    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    I so love the before and after pic of your engine. Do you have a picture of it in your car?
    Thank you, It was a great experience and I learned a lot!!
    20180531_014926 by D. R., on Flickr

    Resized_20170511_203535 by D. R., on Flickr
    Quote Originally Posted by JS Fords only View Post
    Also do you think you made more or less hp and does the fitech learn on it's own or do u need to tune it? Sorry alot of questions but thank you
    The same HP because I stayed stock with the thought that I can always add heads later on for additional HP if desired. Only changed the Cam for a different sound to the motor. Now, I'm over a year so far, and no changes. Just had a lot of fun coming to work this morning with the HP that I have.

    The Fitech learns on its own. I haven't done any reprogramming. Nor am I really capable. That's why I purchased it. Fitech changed a setting or two when the car would stall at quick deceleration. Since the change, it doesn't stall anymore. Runs like a top!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by DadofThree; 07-24-2019 at 07:52 AM.
    Dave
    Mk 3.1 - #6882 - 5.0L 302 - FiTech EFI - 3-Link - 3.08 Ratio - 15" Wheels
    Greenhorn and doing the best I can
    My photos are at: My Flickr acct
    Videos are at: YouTube Videos

  18. Thanks JS Fords only thanked for this post
  19. #16
    Senior Member Big Blocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lost Wages, Nevada
    Posts
    634
    Post Thanks / Like
    Basically a stock 5.0 from '89 with factory EFI . . . had this engine in since we built the car 18 years ago. I 100% agree with what Jeff Kleiner said above, you can romp these little engines all day and it will be there tomorrow, ready to go again.

    Doc
    FFR3712K (MKII) in Lost Wages Nevada.
    5.0 w/tubular GT-40 EFI, E303 cam, Custom 4 into 4 headers, T5, 3-Link 3.73 rear. Full F5 tubular suspension. Drop Butt mod, Dash forward mod, custom foot box air vents, custom turn signal system. 13" PBR brakes, Fiero E-Brake mod, Flaming River 18:1 rack w/ F5 bump steer kit on Breeze bushings. 17" Chrome Cobra "R's" w/ 275 fronts and 315 rears. MKIV seats. FORD Royal Blue w/ Arctic White stripes.

  20. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    Sacramento CA
    Posts
    452
    Post Thanks / Like
    Did you put the 148k on it? Do you still have the running car or just the motor? Still driving it if yes? Are you using the donor parts off it or just the motor? Whole car, how much could you sell it for to put to a new motor?

    If you are just going to use the long block and swap to a carb, what is the difference in buying the intake ,carb , dist and etc. for your long block compared to selling it and buying a new motor.

    Also, how tight is your budget? Some could buy the kit and build for 6 to 12 months then buy the motor!
    Mk3.1 347 AFR 205cc Heads A9L EFI siemens deca 60lb injectors MSD 6AL ignition Vortech V-3 3 Link PS/PB

    -- If you can’t fix it with a hammer, you have an electrical problem ! —

  21. #18
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Just puttering View Post
    Did you put the 148k on it? Do you still have the running car or just the motor? Still driving it if yes? Are you using the donor parts off it or just the motor? Whole car, how much could you sell it for to put to a new motor?

    If you are just going to use the long block and swap to a carb, what is the difference in buying the intake ,carb , dist and etc. for your long block compared to selling it and buying a new motor.

    Also, how tight is your budget? Some could buy the kit and build for 6 to 12 months then buy the motor!
    We bought the car with around 70k and yes we drive the car every weekend since a fun little convertible. The car is salvaged and really isn't worth anything and dont want to put any money in it anymore. The engine is very strong and if I install the engine in the roadster it will have more sentimental value to my wife since the 95 mustang was her first mustang back in 08.

    Budget will be tight on this car and I think I have come to the conclusion that I'm going to keep the original engine at least for another five to ten years or so. Maybe I'll just do a gt40 swap and fitech efi and call it a day. Most of the ppl on this forums seem pretty happy with there older 302s. Thanks for your input everyone.

  22. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Heart of Dixie, Alabama
    Posts
    1,849
    Post Thanks / Like
    Some advise, if you are running stock heads. Replace the valve springs. You will not feel it in the performance, but the stock engines are known for generic, comparatively weak valve springs.
    If you get above 4500 rpm, upgrade the cam, or have a used engine, it needs to be on you check off list.
    20th Anniversary Mk IV, A50XS Coyote, TKO 600, Trunk Drop Box, Trunk Battery Box, Cubby Hole, Seat Heaters, Radiator hanger and shroud.

  23. Thanks JS Fords only thanked for this post
  24. #20
    Senior Member Avalanche325's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Jax Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,103
    Post Thanks / Like
    If it were me. I would either leave it alone and install as is, or go all the way with a rebuild / stroker kit / aftermarket heads etc.

    Is there something wrong with the factory EFI? Besides it not being pretty. The factory EFI seems to be the most dependable. Though, I haven't heard of any Fitech failures. But out of the two people that I know that have it, one loves it, one hates it.

    If you start changing things, one thing leads to the next, and the next, and the next.

  25. Thanks JS Fords only thanked for this post
  26. #21
    Not a waxer Jeff Kleiner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Bloomington, Indiana
    Posts
    8,000
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Avalanche325 View Post
    ...Is there something wrong with the factory EFI? Besides it not being pretty. The factory EFI seems to be the most dependable...
    Did ya' see my comments in post #5? Even though Ron and I have seen & built a bunch of FFRs with other powerplants there might be a reason why we have stuck with the "old reliables" in our personal cars

    Not pretty? I can't see what's under the hood when I'm driving

    Jeff

  27. #22
    Senior Member rich grsc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    O'Fallon, MO
    Posts
    3,068
    Post Thanks / Like
    OH MAN, you want me to read through all that stuff? Just want to jump to the end an throw in my 2 cents worth.

  28. #23
    Senior Member Avalanche325's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Jax Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,103
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yep. Beautiful from the drivers seat!

  29. #24
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    16
    Post Thanks / Like
    Ya I read all of the posts on here, it's just alot to take in and remember it all. I just really hate wires and how they look. I'm 33 years old and have never owned a classic and this may be closest I get to owning one and have always wanted the carburetor look for some reason. I know I'm not the only person out there to fill this way.

    For a person like me to live in a state like California and to always have to deal with smogg being a car guy, getting a car that no longer needs smogg I know I will feel so much satisfaction to give cali the middle finger for bypassing smogg. Not sure what this has to do with efi or carb it's just how I feel. Kinda hard to understand I guess. It's just a young person problem I guess and never growing up with it or the look.

    Thank you for your understanding guys.

  30. #25
    Senior Member Big Blocker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lost Wages, Nevada
    Posts
    634
    Post Thanks / Like
    Well, if you really really want that carb'd look, pull the EFI manifold and swap to a nice carb'd one and slap a Holley or FiTech EFI unit on it, covered up with a carb type air cleaner . . . carb'd look 302 (5.0). Not much money spent and the wife gets to keep her "nostalgia" engine - you guys get a convertible car to take out on the road on weekends for tons of fun . . . and still be reliable.

    You'll probably need a different distributor unless you can figure out a way (MSD ignition) to make the TFI fitted one (used for factory EFI) work - if / when swapping distributors, be extra careful of the dizzy gear, there are issues with using non-EFI type gears on roller cammed engines. Cam is steel and needs a steel dizzy gear as well.

    Is staying with the factory EFI starting to sound like a financially sound idea?

    Just my 2¢

    Doc
    Last edited by Big Blocker; 07-28-2019 at 11:24 AM.
    FFR3712K (MKII) in Lost Wages Nevada.
    5.0 w/tubular GT-40 EFI, E303 cam, Custom 4 into 4 headers, T5, 3-Link 3.73 rear. Full F5 tubular suspension. Drop Butt mod, Dash forward mod, custom foot box air vents, custom turn signal system. 13" PBR brakes, Fiero E-Brake mod, Flaming River 18:1 rack w/ F5 bump steer kit on Breeze bushings. 17" Chrome Cobra "R's" w/ 275 fronts and 315 rears. MKIV seats. FORD Royal Blue w/ Arctic White stripes.

  31. #26
    Senior Member Avalanche325's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Jax Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,103
    Post Thanks / Like
    I don't think I have ever seen a woman that is sentimental about an ENGINE! She's a keeper.

  32. Likes mburger liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Replica Parts

Visit our community sponsor