Very Cool Parts

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Carbon Fiber Body

  1. #1
    Senior Member Xusia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,343
    Post Thanks / Like

    Carbon Fiber Body

    Dave, as I recall, FFR offered a carbon fiber body when the Roadster first came out. Any chance the 818 will have a carbon fiber body option? (hint, hint)

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    669
    Post Thanks / Like
    wow, you just doubled the price of the kit!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    240
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by carbon fiber View Post
    wow, you just doubled the price of the kit!
    For those who want the ultimate lightweight, it might be a price worth paying.

  4. #4
    Senior Member riptide motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale Fl.
    Posts
    3,296
    Post Thanks / Like
    Zero chance.
    FFR Daytona Type 65 Coupe
    67 427 Cobra
    57' Belair
    72 Pinto Wagon ,306" 1/4 miler
    34 5 window coupe Ford
    2003 Mustang GT
    99' ZX9
    85 Goldwing

    All toys still in the Scuderia!


    Every Saint has a past..................every sinner a future

    Don't take yourself so seriously........no one else does.

    You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrists office.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Xusia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eugene, OR, USA
    Posts
    2,343
    Post Thanks / Like
    When they made it for the Roadster, I'm pretty sure it didn't double the price of the kit.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    669
    Post Thanks / Like
    never saw the roadster body. to make an entire body in cf with epoxy resins(not vinyl ester, which should never be used with cf)) and good visual quality is incredibly expensive. it would need to be vacuum infused or autoclaved with pre-peg, the latter would include an oven large enough to bake the entire body. the labor would be high because of the skill and time involved. even if they offered it unfinished (no final sanding and uv clearcoat) like they do cf parts now, it would be costly and the 818 is supposed to be an affordable kit. no offense to ff here, they are offering tons of value with their kits.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    240
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by carbon fiber View Post
    never saw the roadster body. to make an entire body in cf with epoxy resins(not vinyl ester, which should never be used with cf)) and good visual quality is incredibly expensive. it would need to be vacuum infused or autoclaved with pre-peg, the latter would include an oven large enough to bake the entire body. the labor would be high because of the skill and time involved. even if they offered it unfinished (no final sanding and uv clearcoat) like they do cf parts now, it would be costly and the 818 is supposed to be an affordable kit. no offense to ff here, they are offering tons of value with their kits.
    FFR is planning to go with an Thermoform process with the 818. This means lots of smaller panels; 12-16 per Dave. That would be easier than trying to do a whole body like the Roadster's. Also, noone has said that the CF body has to be the primary body. It can certainly be an *option*. The 818 can still hit its price goal and offer optional extras on top of that. Personally, I think the primary value of a Kit car is its inherent flexibility. Offering the customer tons of choices is a good thing in my view. And if someone wants to pay the extra $5K or so for a CF body, let them.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    669
    Post Thanks / Like
    i don't see producing the kind of stuff i'm talking about for 5k. good luck.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    240
    Post Thanks / Like
    *shrug* Doesn't matter what it costs if someone's willing to pay it. Dave has said that forms will be relatively easy to create. If someone is willing to pay for it, I don't see why FFR can't make it. This really would have zero bearing on the price of the base kit.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    669
    Post Thanks / Like
    don't take me wrong, it would be cool. i meant it as an option that would have no bearing on the base price. not trying to be a downer as much as to be realistic. what does dave think?

  11. #11
    Senior Member dclin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Given that the body pieces will not be structural, I don't think the benefits would be as great. No doubt there would be some weight loss, but most of the weight is going to be in the frame itself anyways. Composites real claim to fame is offering a terrific strength to weight ratio. If the CF parts are not structural, the cost benefit probably won't be there. I seriously doubt that thermoformed plastic parts are going to be significantly heavier than a CF piece. The CF piece will undoubtedly be stronger, but it matters less in this application.

    Also, while making bucks for a carbon version of the body parts is not exactly a difficult process, it's likely tedious and time consuming to get it to produce a high level of fit and finish for the final parts. It still is, pretty much, a totally, by-hand process after all, and I think F5 is going to have their hands full simply getting the basic kit out the door in the time frame we want anyways, w/o getting bogged down in side projects.

    Having said that, there will always be people who don't mind spending the cash, and maybe F5 can visit this option after the kits start rolling off the line.

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    Based on pricing out similar projects it would be between 10 to 15 thousand per body taking into account tooling, part development, raw materials and labor. That is based on 1000 units. This also is cost not including profit margins. Basically doubles the cost of the project to drop 10lbs.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    104
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dclin View Post
    Composites real claim to fame is offering a terrific strength to weight ratio. If the CF parts are not structural, the cost benefit probably won't be there.
    QFT. Read that over and over until it sinks in.

  14. #14
    Senior Member dclin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Twinspool View Post
    QFT. Read that over and over until it sinks in.
    Why don't you tell me what you think it means?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    104
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by dclin View Post
    Why don't you tell me what you think it means?
    QFT = Quoted For Truth. You're precisely correct about using composites for non-stressed parts.

  16. #16
    Senior Member dclin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Twinspool View Post
    QFT = Quoted For Truth. You're precisely correct about using composites for non-stressed parts.
    LOL, sorry, I read your post the wrong way. Thought QFT stood for something else. I need to brush up on these darn interweb acronyms. :P

  17. #17
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-REX View Post
    FFR is planning to go with an Thermoform process with the 818.
    That is for non-body parts such as vents and wheel liners.

    With the steel tube frame (chassis) it would make more sense to go with a fabric body before a CF one.

    You do not have to oven bake (autoclave) CF parts. You can autoclave them for more strength. Much of the decorative CF you see on cars have never been baked.
    George; Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

    1977 Porsche 911 Targa, 2.7L CIS Silver/Black, owned since 2003
    1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up Truck 4x4 4.3L V6 Black with front and rear spoilers
    1989 Scat II HP hovercraft with Cuyuna two stroke ULII-02, 35 hp with experimental skirt and sound control

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Replica Parts

Visit our community sponsor