Forte's

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 289 body is a tighter fit than the 427?

  1. #1
    Senior Member OttawaFFRer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like

    289 body is a tighter fit than the 427?

    Gentlemen, this is my second cobra, I built a 427 a decade ago.
    The 427 body went on the car with only a little effort.

    I find the 289 a real fight, the rear cockpit wall is exceptionally tight. I have all the bulb seals in place but tight...very tight.

    Thoughts?

    Thanks,
    Victor
    10 years after my roadster build....
    289 FIA (pickup 28/08/20 if covid permits)
    currently building a 289 and accumulating parts needed to finish a Canadian Kit.

  2. #2
    Senior Member cnutting's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Beachside
    Posts
    577
    Post Thanks / Like
    Haven't built a 427, but did go a couple rounds with the 289. I found it to be tight.
    FFR #8833 289 FIA 3-link
    1965 289, TKO600 from Forte's Parts Connection
    Body and Paint by Mike's Auto Restoration
    Picked up 3/5/2016, First start 4/22/2017, MA legal 7/11/2018
    Build Thread http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...FIA-build-8833
    "Insanity is contagious" - Joseph Heller

  3. #3
    Senior Member OttawaFFRer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by cnutting View Post
    Haven't built a 427, but did go a couple rounds with the 289. I found it to be tight.
    I find I'm putting plenty of my 250-pound gorilla weight into getting the rear cockpit under the rear cockpit fiberglass. Maybe a bit of damage to the glass.
    Did you trim anything?

    I can't imagine trying to get the painted body on without damaging it. I'll review the photos of your car to compare to mine.

    V
    10 years after my roadster build....
    289 FIA (pickup 28/08/20 if covid permits)
    currently building a 289 and accumulating parts needed to finish a Canadian Kit.

  4. #4
    Senior Member OttawaFFRer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like
    I think if I trim the rear wall lip as much as 1/4" in the area indicated by tape the body would settle down another 1/5 inch and I wouldn't have as much interference.
    You can see in the photo that the fiberglass is chipped from my attempts to get the body on.

    Thoughts?

    20230808_173503.jpg20230808_173327.jpg

    Victor
    Last edited by OttawaFFRer; 08-08-2023 at 04:45 PM.
    10 years after my roadster build....
    289 FIA (pickup 28/08/20 if covid permits)
    currently building a 289 and accumulating parts needed to finish a Canadian Kit.

  5. #5
    Senior Member OttawaFFRer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    228
    Post Thanks / Like
    I took 1/4 inch off the rear cockpit and now it's a snug fit but manageable.

    Did you guys use the bulb seal on the top of the rear cockpit aluminum? I have installed bulb seal across the entire rear cockpit aluminum but see mixed opinions on its install on the 427 body.

    Now I need to remove 1/4" of the body from the rear lower rolls at each corner. If I do that the body will go on and off without requiring 95% of my brute force.
    Last edited by OttawaFFRer; 08-09-2023 at 09:40 AM.
    10 years after my roadster build....
    289 FIA (pickup 28/08/20 if covid permits)
    currently building a 289 and accumulating parts needed to finish a Canadian Kit.

  6. #6
    Senior Member JohnnyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Right Around Canton Ohio
    Posts
    137
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by OttawaFFRer View Post
    Did you guys use the bulb seal on the top of the rear cockpit aluminum? I have installed bulb seal across the entire rear cockpit aluminum but see mixed opinions on its install on the 427 body.
    A lot of things have changed since I built mine but my Mark 1 manual specifically says not to use bulb seal on the rear cockpit wall.
    __________________
    John / FFR 1827,
    John's Mark I Roadster Build Site

  7. #7
    Senior Member cnutting's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Beachside
    Posts
    577
    Post Thanks / Like
    I didn't use the bulb seal on the rear, but i recall trimming aluminum on the trunk sides and had to trim the lower valence on the body. It was about that time that I realized the MKIV radiator angle was too steep for the 289 nose and had to make the oil cooler mount removable.
    FFR #8833 289 FIA 3-link
    1965 289, TKO600 from Forte's Parts Connection
    Body and Paint by Mike's Auto Restoration
    Picked up 3/5/2016, First start 4/22/2017, MA legal 7/11/2018
    Build Thread http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...FIA-build-8833
    "Insanity is contagious" - Joseph Heller

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

FFMetal

Visit our community sponsor