Forte's

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Holley / QuickFuel Transition slots vs Manifold Vacuum relationship

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    mcwho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    DeBary - Florida
    Posts
    541
    Post Thanks / Like

    Holley / QuickFuel Transition slots vs Manifold Vacuum relationship

    Trying to understand what the relationship is between Transition slot (t-slot) for primary and secondary on Holley QFT carbs. As they seem to be of similar design, not much info on QFT but lots on Holley.

    I have a QF ss-650-an. It came from the factory with the primary t-slot showing about .090 and the secondary t-slot not showing at all. Was told to make the secondary t-slot show a "square" and also the primary a "square". that would make both of them about .050. Supposedly the reason is the lower manifold vacuum which causes a stumble at just off idle.

    My engine vacuum is right now at 14.5 ~ 15. A normal engine (according to my vacuum guage is in the 17 ~ 22 range. Therefore I believe what is normal for a normal aspirated engine would make the factory settings work for that engine.

    The theory seems to be that the lessening of the vacuum for souped up engines requires these changes to the t-slot settings. Since my Vacuum is not that far from a stock the t-slot settings need not be as radical.

    Therefore if my engine vacuum is say 15 or if it is 13, would the engine with the 13 vacuum need to have twice as much t-slot derivation?

    That being said, after making these adjustments, my engine would not idle below 1200 and the idle air mix screws had no effect when I turned them in and out.

    After that I closed the secondary t-slot setting by turning the set screw out about 1/3 of a turn. That change now made my idle at about 900 and the ims screws to work but my front screws for best vacuum are in the 5/8 turn range and the rears are in the 1/4 ~ 1 1/8 range.

    My mathematical side says that closing the secondary screw slightly more , say 1/4 to 1/3 turn should allow me to get the idle to around 800 or 850.

    Is this a reasonable idle for a 331 stroker with a mild cam, edelbrock performer rpm heads and RPM air gap intake, and a cam with 224/232 duration @ .050

    Before I started this I replaced the spark plugs because the previous carb, an Edelbrock always ran rich and they were black.

    I marked and noted where the original settings were. I increased the set screw on the setting of the secondary
    by 5/8 of a turn or.625 turn, (1/8 - .125 turn, x5 = .625)
    then I backed it out by 2/6 or a turn or .333, note 1 notch on an allen wrench is 1/6 of a turn or .166
    my current effective setting is (.625 - .333) or .292 of a turn
    therefore that .292 of a turn lowered the idle by 300 rpm
    if it is a straight line 1/3 of my last change should net me about -100 rpm or 800 which is my goal.
    .292 / 3 = .097 of a turn, or just over 1/2 a hex wrench notch



    The pics are:
    Primary after and before
    and
    Secondary after and before
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by mcwho; 04-17-2017 at 11:56 PM.
    Baghdad Bob

    Complete Kit Delivered July 2010, serial @ 7287, Whitby Power Brakes, Whitby Tonneau, Power Steering w HEIDTS PS Valve, Hydralic clutch, 15" Wheels, BFG Tires, 331 stroker w Quick Fuel 650, RPM Heads, Air Gap Intake. IRS w 3.27, TKO-600. FFMETAL Firewall Forward, FFMETAL Dropped Battery Box in Trunk, Enlarged Passenger footbox, Breeze Cubby storage, Breeze Seat Brackets, Herbs Door Panels. Ford ruby red 12 coats.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Breeze

Visit our community sponsor