Very Cool Parts

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 121 to 160 of 183

Thread: Project 818 Design Contest Winners

  1. #121
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by BipDBo View Post
    .........far too much frontal air intake area.
    You have a valid point, and not everyone loves the large intakes on let's say an Audi, Mustang or Charger but it's one of the major styling trends going on these days.

    The designs which confuse me have twin openings out to the front edges as if they are using two split-radiators like a Porsche or Ferrari. No form follows function here, but interesting designs just the same.

  2. #122
    Senior Member ScottKoschwitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    I'm not hatin'. I'm discussing a submission that won a public design contest, in explicit, respectful, non-personal, and (I hope) constructive language as possible, recognizing and respecting the amount of both talent and time Cr8tr put into it. He clearly has more design talent than I ever will. I suspect I'm like most here: I know what I like, but I can't draw it.

    However, we are all potential customers here. FFR made the contest, results, and, it seems, the forthcoming development process, open to us, with reasonable limitations, for a reason. As long as we abide by the general rule to keep it respectful and constructive, what's the problem?
    Last edited by ScottKoschwitz; 06-17-2011 at 11:58 AM.

  3. #123
    MKIII #5835 Someday I Suppose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Stanhope, NJ
    Posts
    783
    Post Thanks / Like
    Dave, I wonder if you could do a slide show or such on the home page of the site, someplace to showcase designs, but not have them open for feedback and discussion. I'd love to see some of the works especially those by kids, but totally agree that not all of them need to be critiqued by the masses.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Smith View Post
    There really is no way we can post all 700+ entries. Some of them were lovingly done and obvipously from kids, so I have to find a way to say thanks to EVERYONE who participated without exposing a good-hearted and excited 8 year old boy to criticism. I was thinking we would make a call on perhaps the 30-40 really great entries and throw them up for public debate here. As long as it is respectful of the efforts and passions involved, it will be a great excercise. We have tried SO HARD to be respectful, confidential (where asked), and appreciative thru this whole process. I guess I just want to make sure that all of our work together and everything we do ends up delivering a body shape that lives up to the chasiss and performance of the design. I WILL NOT accept mediocrity in this design. All FFR shapes are beautiful and extreme and dramatic... this one will be no exception and I can only promise one thing... When it drives down the road it will not EVER be msiatken for an OEM Hyundai.
    MKIII #3835 IRS, Anderson Performance 408 Levy T-5 Trans, Team III Wheels
    Paint completed November 2010, passed NJ State Safety Inspection June 21st, Tagged and First Drive 7/1/2011

  4. #124
    Junior Member HealeyRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like
    You know who would've cleaned up in this contest?


  5. #125
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by BipDBo View Post
    It reminds me much less of a Hyundai, and much more of an Aston Martin.
    You say Aston; I'd say the similar but pudgier look a late-90s, early 00s Jaguar coupe, perhaps leavened with a dash of mid-90s Ford Puma. Bland and sort of puffy, which makes this sort of interesting:

    A large opening just creates drag like a parachute, and in my opinion, likens the car to a catfish.
    Because I think the winning design, intake size or no, does have something of the catfish to it.

    I guess this is a clear case of beauty in the eye of the beholder. You like it, the judges liked it, and Cr8tr himself believes it puts the Alfa-Romeo 4C "to shame," but it does nothing for me.

  6. #126
    Senior Member ScottKoschwitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    I agree with blueafro. I think the Alfa 4C is quite striking, and for a while made me calculate how much more it would cost than a Lotus Elise. From the description of it, it sounded like it could suprass the Elise.

    Look, cars are like women. There's just something about a certain one, or a certain type, that pushes your buttons. A buddy of mine could look at one, and his jaw will hit the floor, while I'll say "she's OK." I'm the same way with Cr8tr's design. It's a nice design, and I would build it, but it doesn't take my jaw to the floor.

    Anyway, this whole process will be fun and exciting. It's great that we're all so passionate about cars, and Dave Smith must be thrilled with the amount of attention this project has garnered. For the record, Mr. Smith, if you can make this car look as good as you expect, I will happy to step in line with my order.

  7. #127
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like

    Melting pot of brilliance?

    While there is an appreciable canon that's going to have to occur on FFR's end when it comes to decisions between really eye-catching style and compatibility with affordable OEM components, I really do think that many elements from the top three designs can carry over and mesh extremely well. The styling of the rear end, especially the exhaust arrangement and FactoryFive logo placement of the winning design works extremely well, and could fit very well within the design language of the final product.
    The lower belt line and roll bar arrangement of Xabier's design is excellent, and I think taking a few cues from the GTM design (in a similar fashion to how Mario Morra's design brilliantly incorporates elements from the GTM) to revise the front end could be an amazing functional and stylish nose for this thing.

    I really do feel that integrating design and styling elements from varied designs would reflect exactly the sort of world car the '818' is intended to be.

    I do think the functional direction they were exploring with the top three selected entries (with a Targa, and eventual Coupe being possible) is the right path to go down, and I doubt the finalized design language will be hard to adapt into an absolutely gorgeous Track model with primarily add-on parts (like a chin spoiler, skirts, spoiler, etc.), so while I'm quite certain these are already on the table from the functional standpoint, I think another reason Xabier's design has so much popular following here is because the design seems to have had that in mind from the start.

    While I'm sure that FFR is going to ameliorate any minor styling disagreements by coming out with a stunning final model, I'm still quite certain that they could roll out an ugly, blindingly fast car and we'd build them: I guess all I'm asking is that we all realize that if the styling is right, it could truly be a timeless car, and one with the performance numbers to back it up... if this goes well enough sales on these could outstrip all the recent FFR projects.
    Last edited by TehLlama; 06-17-2011 at 11:50 PM.

  8. #128
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3
    Post Thanks / Like
    The winning submission's design is well done on most accounts, and according to the esteemed judges, is the best one in the lot. Like I said, it was meticulously and beautifully presented and rendered and successfully exhibited the designer's talent. While I consider it a bit too "mainstream" and generic, or others would like to say "Hyundai"-sh, it apparently had the "it" that made it the top pick of the judges based on the parameters and whatever judging criteria was given, which when viewing the winning entries seemed to be very wide open. They probably saw something in the design that honestly I just do not see when envisioning how "my" lightweight, mid-engined, boxer-powered roadster from Factory Five Racing would look like, and the looks plays a big part of the car's character. I just don't feel it.

    For me though, the $9k question really is, whether this is the design direction that "The Boss" is taking the 818 towards, is this the design character that Factory Five Racing will adopt for the 818? Can't wait to see the final design for the 818.

    Based on the winning entries, I am drawn towards Farrands' wild concept roadster, it has a future forward but at the same time retro-tastic, mach five kind of vibe, which when toned down for production would look bonkers racing down the track and cruising down the street. Factory Five meets Speedracer. I am also partial towards Phomsavanh's entry, the shape is aggressive, sporty, compact, light-handed and suggests low center of gravity flat-four turbo boxer power. Put on some Hella projectors or conventional headlights, tidy up the nose and roll bar area and it's good to go. Kobayashi also deserves praise for presenting his raw, true to the template, roadster runabout concept. Sure looks like fun! I was also surprised not to see Ariff's white roadster, which just oozed Factory Five Racing character, much like how a mid-engined MK4 roadster would look like.

    Good stuff, just waiting to see the rest of the submissions.
    Last edited by Fuddmenace; 06-18-2011 at 02:45 AM.

  9. #129
    Junior Member wrw2497's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Sebastian,Florida
    Posts
    15
    Post Thanks / Like
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......I currently own an FFR mk 3 that I bought and built because it is an all american car (albeit based on a brit design),all built here in the USA,with American parts......I think it diminishes Factory Five Racing by adding this half breed....is it a matter of building something cheap ? I thought you were proud of America and the products we make here....I just don't get it......disappointed,really

  10. #130
    Senior Member Steve91T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Huntersville, NC
    Posts
    284
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wrw2497 View Post
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......I currently own an FFR mk 3 that I bought and built because it is an all american car (albeit based on a brit design),all built here in the USA,with American parts......I think it diminishes Factory Five Racing by adding this half breed....is it a matter of building something cheap ? I thought you were proud of America and the products we make here....I just don't get it......disappointed,really
    Then don't buy one. Problem solved.
    Weekends/track days
    1997 Camaro SS 380 rwhp/380 rwtq
    LT1 Stroked to 396. C5 brakes, suspension work, racing seats, roll bar
    Daily driver
    1999 Ford F250 Powerstroke 300 rwhp/600 rwtq
    Custom intake, 4" exhaust, 80 hp DP Tuner PCM tuning 20 MPG highway!

  11. #131
    MKIII #5835 Someday I Suppose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Stanhope, NJ
    Posts
    783
    Post Thanks / Like
    All I can say is that if Hyundai had a car that looked like that I would have bought it by now :-)
    MKIII #3835 IRS, Anderson Performance 408 Levy T-5 Trans, Team III Wheels
    Paint completed November 2010, passed NJ State Safety Inspection June 21st, Tagged and First Drive 7/1/2011

  12. #132
    Senior Member ScottKoschwitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Posts
    100
    Post Thanks / Like
    The recent Hyundais are good looking cars. I always liked the Tiburon, even the first generation, and the Genesis Coupe is pretty sharp and has good performance. However, they are designed and built to be daily drivers and to be sold in huge volume, not to be that special performance car for a niche group like us.

  13. #133
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by blueafro View Post
    Alfa-Romeo 4C
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottKoschwitz View Post
    I agree with blueafro. I think the Alfa 4C is quite striking, and for a while made me calculate how much more it would cost than a Lotus Elise. From the description of it, it sounded like it could suprass the Elise.
    One thing for you guys to remember is the 4C and Elise are very short wheelbase cars compared to the 818 specifications. However I too love those cars and think it would be much easier to meet the weight goal in a more compact package.

    We have seen 1/7th to 1/10th of the +700 entries posted in this forum. For conversation purposes I'm posting my own 7th entry which is early 1960's Bizzarrini/Ferrari + Alfa Romeo 4C influenced. It was by far my most retro design, my wife's favorite if that means anything to the fellows.

    http://s184.photobucket.com/albums/x...rial%20Design/






    As you can see, this just comes off as a much larger car than the ones which inspired it. Not my fault, I just followed the template.

    Sorry, I don't do the computer 3D thing. I got into design because I love to draw, paint and work in clay.
    Last edited by kach22i; 06-18-2011 at 11:02 AM.

  14. #134
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    607
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wrw2497 View Post
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......I currently own an FFR mk 3 that I bought and built because it is an all american car (albeit based on a brit design),all built here in the USA,with American parts......I think it diminishes Factory Five Racing by adding this half breed....is it a matter of building something cheap ? I thought you were proud of America and the products we make here....I just don't get it......disappointed,really
    Oh God, you're one of those. Get over it. This coming from a military dude with family that served in WWII

  15. #135
    President, Factory Five Racing Dave Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Barrington, RI
    Posts
    1,811
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    2
    Lets remember to keep this communictaion respectful and focus on fellowship.

    To WRW2497: I was raised by a Naval Officer and I can tell you that running Factory Five is such an honor because we are an AMERICAN MANUFACTURING company. I think that once I explain more about the 818 you will see the patriotism in the work. Twenty percent of our cars are EXPORTED (thats a great thing and as a country we used to do alot more of that). Of our current product lines it is very difficult and expensive (meaning too many people dont do it) to get american V8 running gear outside of the US, particularly in areas like UK/Europe, and the far east. We picked the Subaru running gear because it is a cool boxer architecture, affordable, but VERY importantly, available in almost every area of the world. So what I am saying is that the japanese running gear enables more people from around the world to build a Factory Five, that was made in Wareham Massachusetts, USA. I respect your feeling and emotions but the fact is that for us to EXPORT is a very good and patriotic thing. Beyond that, I have plans to power the car with alternate drivetrains like the TDI and possibly Fords new 1 litre turbo eco-boost engine.

    Lets all remember that this forum is here to serve the community, as I am here in the best job in the world, only because you guys are willing to let me keep doing this. I am locking up the building, but I took three customers on my traditional parking lot 90 mph drift session... Three more converts to the church of Factory Five... Three more people who now understand the beauty and functional beauty of the FFR chassis. Have a great weekend!
    Dave Smith, FFR 001
    President
    Factory Five Racing

  16. #136
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    One thing for you guys to remember is the 4C and Elise are very short wheelbase cars compared to the 818 specifications.
    I am curious about the 4C's wheelbase. When the concept was first shown, the wheelbase is given as "less than 2.4 meters," which presumable means "more than 2.3 meters." That would put it between 90.5 and 94.5 inches, which ranges from Elise-size to 1/2 inch shorter than 818. Given the number 2.4 was given instead of 2.3, I'd guess it's closer to the 818 than to the Elise, but by how much? (Of course a production version, if it ever appears, may deviate significantly from the show car.)

    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    However I too love those cars
    I mentioned the 4C not because I love the design, but because I found it very interesting that Cr8tr offered it as a direct comparison to his winning design (months before he won, no less). That's doubly interesting given how well the judges responded to his design.

    The 4C is a bold, distinctive, and (to my eye) fairly cohesive design, but I'm personally on the fence about it. Some parts of the 4C I like a lot (nose, front fenders, cockpit elevation, rear hatch and trunk), where others I find awkward (transition from door to rear-fender intakes), and other parts a bit cliched (lower tail and taillights).

    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    it would be much easier to meet the weight goal in a more compact package.
    It will be interesting to see how close FF comes to its weight targets, but I'm not sure the chosen wheelbase is going to be much of a problem. If the car at a crude estimate weighs roughly the same for every inch of wheelbase, then a 5% difference in wheelbase (Elise vs. 818) would only work out to 40 or so kilos, or 90 lbs. In reality, that's not a good yardstick given that the mechanicals are staying the same, as presumably are the overhangs, so the real difference might be less.
    Last edited by blueafro; 06-18-2011 at 12:20 PM. Reason: Clarity

  17. #137
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    For conversation purposes I'm posting my own 7th entry which is early 1960's Bizzarrini/Ferrari + Alfa Romeo 4C influenced. It was by far my most retro design, my wife's favorite if that means anything to the fellows.

    I like how you handled the transition from door to vents. It looks far better to me than how Alfa-Romeo handled the same thing on the 4C. I also like the side elevation of the cockpit.

  18. #138
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    23
    Post Thanks / Like
    Dave,
    I applaud the use of a WRX power plant design. You hit the nail on the head when you mentioned that we, as a Nation, need to increase our export base. A country cannot sustain its self off of government jobs and the service industries. There is a need to have tangible products for the purpose of a tax base. Especially in a global market. We gave up isolation policies a long time ago (which is not a bad thing) so long as we have a strong manufacturing base. Unfortunately we have sent most of our industry overseas in the interest of avarice… Without product lines, textiles, or raw materials to sell abroad, (or even locally for that matter) our debit will only increase as there are more monies being spent on government jobs and social programs than our infrastructure can afford.

    One of the issues I have with GTM Supercar is the need for a Corvette donor car… Corvettes fetch premium prices in my neck of the woods. And going through a dealership is prohibitive. The WRX platform is very plentiful in my area. This platform is a little easier for me to come by. WRX power plants already have a strong support community. Modifications that work for reasonably priced and reliable horsepower/torque increases are well documented. And the sound of a well tuned WRX STI engine is amazing. How do they make that little engine sound like a rumbling V-8?

    The idea of multiple power plants is a strong one. Ford is indeed doing amazing things these days, so it’s hard to go wrong with most of their drive train options… Is Alan Mulally still running the show there? Either way, the more options for completing the kits, the better.

    In short, things at factory five seem to be going… seem to be continuing, in the right direction. And remember, if people are not concerned about your direction and products, that means they probably don’t care. And that would tell you that you’re doing something wrong. Never rest upon your laurels.

  19. #139
    Junior Member Super Buggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Harbor City, CA
    Posts
    2
    Post Thanks / Like
    I would like to thank you for the opportunity to participate in this 818 body design contest. I'm very honored to have been chosen Tim Suddard Judge's Award! Also I’m a potential 818 customer. Thank you so much


  20. #140
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by blueafro View Post
    4C's wheelbase..............90.5 and 94.5 inches, which ranges from Elise-size to 1/2 inch shorter than 818.
    818 = 95"

    http://www.carfolio.com/specificatio...car/?car=77396
    or here
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Exige
    Elise = 90.6"

    So the Elise wheelbase is about 4-1/2" shorter than the 818's.

    From below, the 818 wheelbase is as long as the C4's whole body:
    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/01/a...t-geneva-2011/
    Smaller than the 8C it essentially succeeds, the 4C doesn't shed the excitement factor, just concentrates it into a more compact shape. In fact, at less than eight feet long, it doesn't get much more concentrated than this
    web630-4c-live08.jpg

    Mind you my original comment was rather seat of the pants, based on general observations. These first impressions hold true upon further research.

    Blueafro:
    I like how you handled the transition from door to vents
    Yea, line drawings can let you get away with murder sometimes. This time in my mind I imagine the line from the two different directions would have to bump into each other. This point could be a null or flat spot, but I think working in clay I would put a shallow crease there, a "score line" if you will. This crease or score line could/would be part of the side/hood ridge and rear intake as well, perhaps hidden in a fold until the unification brought it to light.

    I also remember thinking a door release handle could be hidden inside of the rear side vent. I tend to design things more complex than I end up building them. Which is why I like to get my hands dirty - keeps me honest.
    Last edited by kach22i; 06-18-2011 at 05:06 PM.

  21. #141
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San Diego CA & Cave Creek AZ
    Posts
    294
    Post Thanks / Like
    The Chrysler Crossfire, and of course the old Dodge Chargers, featured that positive-negative transition as a main side design element. I think they both just let the feature not actually connect. It still flows together visually.
    One of the Greek guys used a similar transition on his entry, albeit in the opposite direction.
    You are to be credited to realize that there is an issue making the element actually read through.
    Last edited by olpro; 06-18-2011 at 05:21 PM.

  22. #142
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    So the Elise wheelbase is about 4-1/2" shorter than the 818's.
    Yes, the Elise wheelbase is 2.3 meters, which is why in referring to 2.3 meters as the probable lower bound of the published figures on the 4C wheelbase, I referred to it as "Elise size."

    From below, the 818 wheelbase is as long as the C4's whole body:
    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/01/a...t-geneva-2011/
    I don't see where you're seeing that. This is text from the press release in your link:

    "a length of approximately 4 metres and a wheelbase of less than 2.4 metres." Four meters is 157". 2.4 meters is 94.5", which is why I compared the 818's 95" to the range of 2.3 to 2.4 meters, which I termed "Elise-size to 1/2 inch shorter than 818," or 90.5-94.5".

    By comparison, the overall length of the Smart Car, which is about the shortest real car around, is 2.5 meters or 98.5", so an overall length of 95" for the 4C woud be incredibly tiny.

    Edit: Okay, I do see where you are getting that. The Autoblog editors either mistook wheelbase for overall length or simply expressed themselves poorly. The press release gives the actual figures.
    Last edited by blueafro; 06-18-2011 at 05:30 PM.

  23. #143
    Senior Member prematureapex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    112
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wrw2497 View Post
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......I currently own an FFR mk 3 that I bought and built because it is an all american car (albeit based on a brit design),all built here in the USA,with American parts......I think it diminishes Factory Five Racing by adding this half breed....is it a matter of building something cheap ? I thought you were proud of America and the products we make here....I just don't get it......disappointed,really
    Ok, guess you won't be returning to this forum then. Bye.

  24. #144
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by blueafro View Post
    I don't see where you're seeing that.
    The quote is from the first sentence in the second paragraph.
    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/01/a...t-geneva-2011/

    Click the link, that woman is either an Amazon or the car is tiny.

    I'm thinking that the C4 could be smaller than the Lancia Stratos, and that is small, real small.

    I saw the C8 today in person, just a beautiful car.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by kach22i; 06-18-2011 at 06:29 PM.

  25. #145
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
    The quote is from the first sentence in the second paragraph.
    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/01/a...t-geneva-2011/
    Yes, but it's wrong. You have to click the link further down the page to expand the press release.

    that woman is either an Amazon or the car is tiny.
    She is tall, and she is wearing high heels, but imagine her in the horizontal, and you'll see she'd never fit in the wheelbase, much less the overall length.

  26. #146
    Senior Member crackedcornish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    306
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by blueafro View Post
    Yes, but it's wrong. You have to click the link further down the page to expand the press release.



    She is tall, and she is wearing high heels, but imagine her in the horizontal, and you'll see she'd never fit in the wheelbase, much less the overall length.
    I was doing just that

  27. #147
    Senior Member bromikl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    378
    Post Thanks / Like
    Call me crazy, but I am completely unable to see any similarities between Cr8er's design and the 4C. They both have four wheels. After that, I'm not seeing it.


    Though if FFR wanted to duplicate its size, I'm totally OK with that. Not sure why the 818 needs a 95 inch wheelbase. The Exige is 90.5 inches, and handles wonderfully.

  28. #148
    Senior Member riptide motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale Fl.
    Posts
    3,296
    Post Thanks / Like
    5" of wheelbase translates into alot when it comes to leg room as well as overall proportions......
    FFR Daytona Type 65 Coupe
    67 427 Cobra
    57' Belair
    72 Pinto Wagon ,306" 1/4 miler
    34 5 window coupe Ford
    2003 Mustang GT
    99' ZX9
    85 Goldwing

    All toys still in the Scuderia!


    Every Saint has a past..................every sinner a future

    Don't take yourself so seriously........no one else does.

    You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrists office.

  29. #149
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    26
    Post Thanks / Like
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......
    As a veteran and proud american I say to you...that was over a half century ago time to let go. This is a totally different world now, we have to be open to globalization if we want to remain as powerful as we are. I have no problem buying a japanese car (actually own one), I work hard for my money so I am going to spend it in the what I consider the wisest way possible. I bought it from an american dealership and the car was built by american workers so the majority of the price went to americans. Also, I look at it this way, if the american auto industry wants to receive all of this money then step up your game and build a comparable product. We shouldn't reward mediocrity!

  30. #150
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like
    Some very good designs out there, and the finalists are also quite good looking! I'd be very interested in buying a kit if it was offered as a coupe, or a targa top as I'd use the car as a summer car more than likely. Any ideas for expected dates for the final design, and of course; when the kit would be available?

  31. #151
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1
    Post Thanks / Like
    Loving the 818 project! Can't wait to see what FFR decides to include in their final design.

    Dave, is there any chance you can have an email list or Twitter feed or something to allow us to keep up to date with the latest news on the 818??? The forum is great for discussions, but I'd love to hear the latest details as soon as they come out to the public. Something just for the 818 news.

    Thanks for putting on such an awesome project!

  32. #152
    Administrator David's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Eldo CA
    Posts
    443
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Smith View Post
    I guess I'm just in love with Xabiers track car.
    Xabier's 818R side view
    That car would be just as sexy with a windshield and no rear wing. That profile is beautiful and well proportioned. Id be a buyer for sure. Most of the others probably not.

    David
    Mk4 Build Thread: http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showthread.php?141-David-s-Mk4-Build-Thread

    GTM Project Build site: http://www.gtmbuild.com

    Few Cool GTM Parts: http://www.gtmbuild.com/parts.htm

  33. #153
    Senior Member riptide motorsport's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Fort Lauderdale Fl.
    Posts
    3,296
    Post Thanks / Like
    Actually if it doesn't look like that or that good.....I'm not buying it!!!!!!!!
    FFR Daytona Type 65 Coupe
    67 427 Cobra
    57' Belair
    72 Pinto Wagon ,306" 1/4 miler
    34 5 window coupe Ford
    2003 Mustang GT
    99' ZX9
    85 Goldwing

    All toys still in the Scuderia!


    Every Saint has a past..................every sinner a future

    Don't take yourself so seriously........no one else does.

    You never see a motorcycle parked outside a Psychiatrists office.

  34. #154
    FF Newb LiquidPT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bellevue, WA from Port Coquitlam, BC
    Posts
    19
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    That car would be just as sexy with a windshield and no rear wing. That profile is beautiful and well proportioned. Id be a buyer for sure. Most of the others probably not.

    David
    You mean like this?





    (3rd place winner from page 1. Same car in street form)

  35. #155
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    134
    Post Thanks / Like


    with the roof on, still amazing... would be great to see it with a glass T-top like the older corvett

    (i don't like the tinting on this one... but it is a good example)

    M-1131pair.jpgTHW310.JPG
    Last edited by Ks2; 06-26-2011 at 04:27 PM.

  36. #156
    Senior Member Steve91T's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Huntersville, NC
    Posts
    284
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Ks2 View Post


    with the roof on, still amazing... would be great to see it with a glass T-top like the older corvett

    (i don't like the tinting on this one... but it is a good example)

    M-1131pair.jpgTHW310.JPG
    Waaaaay too heavy.
    Weekends/track days
    1997 Camaro SS 380 rwhp/380 rwtq
    LT1 Stroked to 396. C5 brakes, suspension work, racing seats, roll bar
    Daily driver
    1999 Ford F250 Powerstroke 300 rwhp/600 rwtq
    Custom intake, 4" exhaust, 80 hp DP Tuner PCM tuning 20 MPG highway!

  37. #157
    Member Justen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cranston, RI
    Posts
    85
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wrw2497 View Post
    I really do not understand why you would pick a japanese drive train for this project.....I, for one do NOT buy japanese cars,have never owned one and will never own one.....I am old enough to know that the japanese are not our friends and never have been,just ask a WW 2 veteran....A lot of great Americans were killed by the japanese and thier backstabbing ways......I currently own an FFR mk 3 that I bought and built because it is an all american car (albeit based on a brit design),all built here in the USA,with American parts......I think it diminishes Factory Five Racing by adding this half breed....is it a matter of building something cheap ? I thought you were proud of America and the products we make here....I just don't get it......disappointed,really

    the Subaru powerplant is just one of the options for this car. At the open house Dave was talking about many different powerplants as well as different bodies. There was mention of putting the Ford
    EcoBoost engine as an alternative as well as bio-diesel options. so do some research before you start hatin'

  38. #158
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    101
    Post Thanks / Like

    Similar design. Toyota GRMN

    Hewlett-Packard Technology Award for Best Integration of Computer Technology - Davy Phomsavanh



    Look how similar these two designs ended up.
    http://www.gizmag.com/toyota-grmn-sp...cept-ii/19008/http://www.gizmag.com/toyota-grmn-sp...cept-ii/19008/
    toyota-grmn-sports-concept-ii.jpg

  39. #159
    Senior Member kach22i's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    894
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kitcarj View Post
    Look how similar these two designs ended up.
    Easy to see similarities with the colors matching like that.

    However if you can click the link below, the Toyota may have more in common with a Audi concept sketch I dug up while doing research for the 818 competition.

    Link:
    http://thehotseatforum.com/forum/vie...hp?f=15&t=1237
    George; Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

    1977 Porsche 911 Targa, 2.7L CIS Silver/Black, owned since 2003
    1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up Truck 4x4 4.3L V6 Black with front and rear spoilers
    1989 Scat II HP hovercraft with Cuyuna two stroke ULII-02, 35 hp with experimental skirt and sound control

  40. #160
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San Diego CA & Cave Creek AZ
    Posts
    294
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by kitcarj View Post
    Hewlett-Packard Technology Award for Best Integration of Computer Technology - Davy Phomsavanh



    Look how similar these two designs ended up.
    http://www.gizmag.com/toyota-grmn-sp...cept-ii/19008/http://www.gizmag.com/toyota-grmn-sp...cept-ii/19008/
    toyota-grmn-sports-concept-ii.jpg
    They are both red. Other than that?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Stewart Transport

Visit our community sponsor