Midwest Classic Insurance

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Pics of the new FFR fuel tank and rear cockpit aluminum

  1. #1
    Moonlight Performance
    Hindsight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,402
    Post Thanks / Like

    Pics of the new FFR fuel tank and rear cockpit aluminum

    Here it is. The top of the tank is setup to re-use the OEM fuel pump and fuel pump bracket assembly (no modification required - just pull it from the donor and drop it into the new tank), and the same thing for the second OEM fuel level sensor (drops right in though you do have to cutoff the fuel tube that reaches down to the bottom of the tank because it's too long which also means you have to cap the outlet on the top of the sender).

    Comes with 3 new rear cockpit aluminum panels and a new tunnel cover. Tunnel cover is not in these pics obviously. Gives a lot of additional legroom, unfortunately for me, the leg room isn't the issue - it's the fact that the top of my back seat hits the roll bar cross tube due to how far I have my seat angled back to get my head down lower. Moving the seat back would require decreasing the incline angle which will raise my head too high.

    The passenger side aluminum opens up some potential to have the ECU and some other pieces inside the cabin instead of in there with the tank. That will allow for easier access. You'd have to make a little cover for it obviously, but I like the setup. Might even be able to fit an Accusump over there.

    Thought you might enjoy seeing the new stuff:




    Last edited by Hindsight; 04-08-2015 at 07:28 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    That is funny, I just took almost these exact same position photos and was going to create a thread. You beat me!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    The new tank actually has more capacity and uses the stock pump assembly without dismantling.

  5. #5
    Senior Member TrickyPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Lewiston ME
    Posts
    117
    Post Thanks / Like
    I actually took a break line bender and bent the line on the sender that has the sock on the end of it into a pigtail (like a curly Q) and it fit right in without an issue. Not sure if the is will cause problems in the future? Anyone want to give me some input if that's OK to do?

  6. #6
    PLATNUM Supporting Member
    wallace18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Trenton, Florida
    Posts
    5,384
    Post Thanks / Like
    While this tank is looking far better than the 33 tank. IMO the Boyd tank still has it beat. JMO.

  7. #7
    Moonlight Performance
    Hindsight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,402
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by TrickyPete View Post
    I actually took a break line bender and bent the line on the sender that has the sock on the end of it into a pigtail (like a curly Q) and it fit right in without an issue. Not sure if the is will cause problems in the future? Anyone want to give me some input if that's OK to do?
    Will be ok as long as its out of the way of the float arms. the manual doesnt mention it but you need to cap it off on the outside end.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by wallace18 View Post
    While this tank is looking far better than the 33 tank. IMO the Boyd tank still has it beat. JMO.
    Maybe, but the Boyd tank sacrifices capacity. I want as much fuel as possible.

  9. #9
    Moonlight Performance
    Hindsight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,402
    Post Thanks / Like
    One other thing I noticed about the tank is that it has just an upright baffle that's maybe 3" tall. There is no "cup" like the hot rod tank had to keep fuel in it. Not sure the new setup will work as well to keep the pump from starving but who knows. Wish those Holley pickup sponge-things were cheaper.

    And another note is that there is no more rollover valve that shuts off fuel flow to the vent line when in a rollover situation.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    I was thinking about that. I honestly don't think it will be that big of a difference. That little bowl had round edges at the bottom almost giving any fuel in there extra velocity to splash out.

  11. #11
    Moonlight Performance
    Hindsight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,402
    Post Thanks / Like
    Yeah, I might try to fab up a bowl that has some partial top edges to it and weld it in.

  12. #12
    Senior Member flynntuna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    San Diego Ca 92106
    Posts
    1,972
    Post Thanks / Like
    Is this the new standard tank or is it a option?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    Pretty certain it is the new standard.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Hindsight View Post
    Yeah, I might try to fab up a bowl that has some partial top edges to it and weld it in.
    I bet a tig torch can fit in the oval pump opening. I may try also, just make sure you put some trickle holes in bottom so you don't accidentally starve the pump if there is still gas in the rest of tank right?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,112
    Post Thanks / Like
    Now the question is how did you get this tank from FFR, did they just send it out to you or did you have to pay for it and how much did it cost you.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,362
    Post Thanks / Like
    They charged me, but at a little discount. I bought the new shift linkage also.
    Last edited by bbjones121; 04-09-2015 at 07:44 PM.

  17. #17
    Senior Member metros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    1,064
    Post Thanks / Like
    I like the new tank. The top looks much more confidence inspiring compared to the original tank. The seal around the pump opening seems sketchy at best.

  18. #18
    Senior Member NBinSD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    130
    Post Thanks / Like
    What's the new shift linkage option? Is there a thread on that somewhere?

  19. #19
    Senior Member NBinSD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    130
    Post Thanks / Like
    Forget that... I googled and found it. http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...al-Revision-1o

  20. #20
    nkw8181's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    762
    Post Thanks / Like
    Looks nice.
    Nolan
    65 coupe Gen 3 "Phoenix" build
    http://thefactoryfiveforum.com/showt...032#post297032

    818 s (with r windscreen ) 350 rwhp. Registered and street legal (SOLD)

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Canton, MI
    Posts
    106
    Post Thanks / Like
    looks like a copy of my tank...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Stewart Transport

Visit our community sponsor