Visit our community sponsor
Hey guys just digging into this.
I was under the impression the adjustable Wilwood prop valve was plumbed into the rear line but in speaking to FFR they said to remove the OEM one (suggested here to gut and plug) and Wilwood adjustable valve actually gets plumbed into the front line.
Can anyone confirm that?
Last edited by Doc76; 11-05-2024 at 05:05 PM.
Doc, the fox body V8 Mustang has a weight distribution of approximately 60/40 front/rear. Manufactures, for safety reasons, are always going to set their brake system to lock the front brakes before the rears in all conditions. The FFR roadster is very close to 50/50 weight distribution. Mustang brakes will always have too much front bias to achieve maximum stopping power when used on the roadster.
The question is, do you need maximum braking ability for how you intend to use the car? Are you going to be racing? Or, are you going to be driving friends and family around and want good, safe and reliable brakes?
If you mess around with brakes, without knowing exactly what you’re doing, you can create a very dangerous situation. Too much rear bias will cause the back end to come around and you will be looking back where you were coming from.
Norm
Mk4 base kit 7721, 331 Stroker, Holley Sniper EFI, Wipers, Heater, Whitby Soft Top, Drop trunk mod and more
Have you thought about possibly going with 1995 Ford Explorer Rear Brakes?
They use a Top Hat style brake rotor for the parking brake.
I've got them on my car and they work very well.
The diameter is just a bit over 11 inches.
I got my set up from Moser Engineering.
Check out Moser Engineering's OEM style rear brake systems shown below:
https://www.moserengineering.com/Par...rake-Kits.dept
Last edited by GoDadGo; 11-06-2024 at 10:00 AM.
Video from Master Power Brakes on brake combination valves: https://youtu.be/dD1dbNtH-6s
I have the MPB disc-disc combination valve installed.
I have it installed with the prop valve to the rear brakes. According to MPB it only kicks in under severe braking to keep the rear end stable. It doesn't proportion the rear brakes at other times.
The function I really wanted was the safety shuttle so if I get a line failure I still have braking capability, somewhat reduced.
Picture attached
IMG_0480.jpg
I have removable panels for easy access. The MC is for a Chrysler New Yorker, 1"-ish (metric) bore with left hand ports. Just no room on a MK1 with booster to get the lines in on a Mustang MC with RH ports. Under floor exhaust so tons of room and no heat problems
Can I cut these brackets off to clean up the axles once pulled and welding or is there a chance they’re used for future mods?
Looks like the Moser axle doesn’t have them either.
IMG_0985.jpgIMG_0986.jpg
Those brackets are for the quad shocks used with the Mustang 4 link suspension. You already have a 3 link setup so they can go.
Norm
Mk4 base kit 7721, 331 Stroker, Holley Sniper EFI, Wipers, Heater, Whitby Soft Top, Drop trunk mod and more
Took longer than I hoped but one last step to test fit the wheels to verify clearance and it’s all ready to strip.
That’s again to all those here that offered support
IMG_0999.jpgIMG_1001.jpgIMG_0988.jpgIMG_1002.jpg
Also, I see that my studs are now too short. Thank goodness I didn’t order axles yet. There a heavy 3/16” too short to the face of the nut.
Any recommendations on how long to lengthen them by without interfering with the trim ring?
IMG_1006.jpgIMG_1004.jpgIMG_1003.jpegIMG_1005.jpg
Last edited by Doc76; 12-02-2024 at 05:53 PM.
Anyone have pictures they could share of how they routed the 20” SS rear brake line from the FFR conversion kit?
Seems the line is ~3” too long and the only way I can see they can work is to put a loop in the line. I get there need to be extra for axle drop. FFR said the lines used to be 17” but now they provide 20” front and rear.
IMG_1023.jpeg
Is there anything else I should look for before yanking everything back off for rear end removal?
Hey Doc on your rear axle stud length. Are you sure all the surfaces are clean and pulled completely flush. The stock axle stud should have 1.34” available length. The stack up, brake rotor, wheel and lug nut is approximately 1.34” loose fit before torque applied. You may have something interfering with allowing for flush draw up?
Just a thought?
Best regards.
MKII donor build using 1990 LX. 5.0, EFI, 5sp. 3 Link, 3.55 gears and other upgrades added over the years. On the road since 2003.
Hey Flip
Thanks for the feedback.
I just checked, off the axle face my studs are 1.325” and the rotor is ~.324”. When I mount the rotor and hold it to the axle face I have .978”. When I measure the face of the nut sitting in the wheel, to the back of the wheel face I get 1.193”. So those checks verify the studs on these axles are now ~1/4” too short just to the face of the nut. Couple that with the fact the first ~1/4” of the stud has no thread, I think I need studs 1/2” longer on my new axles.
Any feedback is appreciated
IMG_1029.jpg
OK good check. I’m not an engineer and don’t play one on TV. Maybe others with more knowledge in this area can chime in. When torqued to spec if the end of the stud is flush with the face of the nut that may be enough thread engagement? I know the studs are tapered with no thread on the end.
Many others have put these exact parts together with the same results. If there is a problem many others have the same issue.
Best regards Flip
MKII donor build using 1990 LX. 5.0, EFI, 5sp. 3 Link, 3.55 gears and other upgrades added over the years. On the road since 2003.
lol we call them pretengineers in my line of work.
I did a bunch more reading this.
From what I can tell the 1987-1993 era mustangs and explorers had longer studs on the axles than Aerostars which were also pillaged for the 5 lug conversions on many mustangs.
Not sure if this is possible.
I’ll call FFR this week.
Last edited by Doc76; 12-02-2024 at 12:43 AM.
you need longer studs, Press the old ones out and pull new ones in. The threads on the lug nuts should be fully engaged with the threads on the studs.
David W
Mkll 4874 built in 2004
Gen 3 coupe #16 registered 2018 painted 2019
Pretty simple really. The FFR rims which you have use open ended lug nuts. If the threads don’t come all the way through the studs are too short.
Jeff
Doc, recommend you press a stud out and take it with you to the parts store. I bought some online that I thought were correct but my Moser SN95 conversion axles had a bigger knurled section where they pressed into the axle flange than the regular SN95 ones.
Got 10 longer replacement ones at Costco. Saw they had a vast assortment of studs while I was there getting winter tires for another vehicle. Apparently they brake a lot of studs.
Norm
Mk4 base kit 7721, 331 Stroker, Holley Sniper EFI, Wipers, Heater, Whitby Soft Top, Drop trunk mod and more
Do any of you guys know how far the stud can stick past the nut face before interfering with the decorative cap held on by the spinner?
Thread engagement at minimum is equal to the diameter of the stud. So a 1/2" stud needs 1/2" of threads. Look at a bolt & nut, the nuts are rarely taller than the diameter of the bolt.
Mrk III, 331 stroker, Borla stack injection, T5, 3:55 IRS, Power steering and brakes. Kleiner body & paint
Here's one that I have in here currently with FFR rims along with their supplied lug nuts and wheel studs. It could go farther, but why would you? As long as there are threads beyond the end of the nut there's no need.
Jeff
wheel stud.jpg
Spoke to FFR today who said the 20” lines you just gotta kinda find a way to make them work so they don’t get hung up on anything. I plan to reassemble everything (axles are out now) to look at it again. If I install per the instructions, the lines are simply too long and look like they’ll rub on the tire. Rather than mounting the bracket vertically, facing out, I wonder if mounting it horizontally to promote the line dropping down is the way to go.
This is how Mark at Breeze suggested running the front lines to avoid a similar situation on the front 20” lines to avoid them rubbing when turning.
Last edited by Doc76; 12-02-2024 at 05:56 PM.