Forte's

Visit our community sponsor

Thanks Thanks:  9
Likes Likes:  19
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 112 of 112

Thread: Tim's Type 65 Build

  1. #81
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Kbl7td View Post
    The yoke will be diff from manual VS auto.
    The dismantler description stated it came out of a manual transmission car so it should be "standard" to us.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  2. #82
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Good news is the supplied adapter with my kit fits:

    Adapter for Diff.jpg

    I am going to go ahead and replace the half shaft seals as well. One appears to have been leaking but hard to tell since wrecking yards tend to get carried away with their pressure washing. I wouldn't think these would be leaking in a 2024 with 14K miles but I guess you never know. Either way, inexpensive "upgrade" and easy to do while on the bench.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  3. #83
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    I know this is probably a long shot but thought I would throw it out there. My used seats came with brackets for a C6. After comparing them to Corbeau's website it looks like they us a generic frame and then customize the locations of the risers to suit a given vehicle. I think I can make them work but here's my ask:

    Can anyone provide feedback on how high the frame should be off the floor? These have rake to the rear and are about 2.5 inches high in the front and maybe 1 inch in the rear. I can cut and weld as needed, relocate the risers and make sure they bolt through the floor in the appropriate locations. The sliders are bolted tight to the seats and only add about 3/4" of overall height. Any feedback would be appreciated.

    Seat Bracket.jpg
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  4. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    The back bottom of my Sparcos seats almost touch the floor. There is a balance between seeing over the dash and where your head lands relative to the side roll bar. I was trying to keep my head from hitting the side bar when sitting in them. I also had to cut some of the body, by the door, to get them to sit back far enough.

  5. #85
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by burchfieldb View Post
    The back bottom of my Sparcos seats almost touch the floor. There is a balance between seeing over the dash and where your head lands relative to the side roll bar. I was trying to keep my head from hitting the side bar when sitting in them. I also had to cut some of the body, by the door, to get them to sit back far enough.
    Thanks for the response. I have reviewed Paul B's. build thread extensively and I think his seats are the same way. Essentially sitting flat on the floor and using the built in reclination of the seat instead of anything built into the mounting brackets. I think I may just cut the risers off the brackets and work backwards until I find the sweet spot. I am not sure where the seat will land in relation to the harness mounts either.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  6. #86
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like

    Making Some Progress

    This is a bit of a hodge podge update. I am finally in the home stretch of my Triumph TR5T build. I committed to finishing this before becoming all consumed with the Coupe. Need to install the exhaust and plumb the fuel lines but probably ready for first start this week. A picture for proof and posterity:

    Current Status.JPG

    Now on to the Coupe! I actually installed my very first piece today with the steering rack. Pretty straightforward but a couple of comments. I am going to powdercoat the retainer bracket (along with many other pieces) but before I do so I am going to hollow out a half moon to clear the steering rack tube so it's not sawing on the sharp edge of the bracket for the next how ever many years:

    Steering Bracket.jpg

    I also am curious if anyone is aware if there is a separate inventory sheet for this item:

    Inventory List.jpg

    I am asking because after searching twice, I was unable to locate 1/2" grade 8 washers and nuts for the steering rack bolts. Most of the other sub-boxes with multiple components had additional inventories but I couldn't find one for the hardware pack. So, off to Ace this morning and picked up the washers and nuts and loosely installed them. I also installed the zerks on the Moog tie rod ends a la edwardB but opted to not install the Energy Suspension boots since the Moog boots were quite well fastened on (maybe crimped with an internal wire?) and they were logoed so I stuck with them. For anyone interested, the zerks are 7 mm.

    Moog Tie Rod Ends.jpg

    And so there is actually proof I did something:
    Steering Rack.jpg

    Carry On!
    Last edited by PNWTim; 01-28-2025 at 02:44 PM.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  7. Likes Just 1 More, jbs72697, 460.465USMC liked this post
  8. #87
    Senior Member edwardb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lake Orion, Michigan
    Posts
    10,884
    Post Thanks / Like
    Away you go! FYI, the Energy Suspension polyurethane boots will greatly outlast the rubber boots. Plus they're a lot stronger. Those are the reasons to switch them out. Your choice though.
    Build 1: Mk3 Roadster #5125. Sold 11/08/2014. Build 2: Mk4 Roadster #7750. Sold 04/10/2017. Build Thread
    Build 3: Mk4 Roadster 20th Anniversary #8674. Sold 09/07/2020. Build Thread and Video. Build 4: Gen 3 Type 65 Coupe #59. Gen 3 Coyote. Legal 03/04/2020. Build Thread and Video
    Build 5: 35 Hot Rod Truck #138. LS3 and 4L65E auto. Rcvd 01/05/2021. Legal 04/20/2023. Build Thread. Sold 11/9/2023.

  9. #88
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by edwardb View Post
    Away you go! FYI, the Energy Suspension polyurethane boots will greatly outlast the rubber boots. Plus they're a lot stronger. Those are the reasons to switch them out. Your choice though.
    I had every intention of doing so but the rubber boots are really anchored on there. I couldn't decide how aggressive to go with a screwdriver, etc. to remove them. I have the poly boots, just didn't install. I will take another look.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  10. #89
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Tim, these are the lists that I got from Dave at FFR.





    As for the tube on the steering rack, I was able to flex it enough to provide clearance without having to cut the bracket.

  11. #90
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by burchfieldb View Post
    Tim, these are the lists that I got from Dave at FFR.





    As for the tube on the steering rack, I was able to flex it enough to provide clearance without having to cut the bracket.
    Good info, thanks. I don't think they actually include the 1/2" nuts and washers in grade 8. Although I doubt it matters, I am not a fan of mixing and matching grade 5 and 8 together. I was going to ask FF to send me the missing pieces but it looks like they supplied them, they are grade 5 (although the manual specifically states they are grade 8). Anyhow, no big deal and I appreciate the list for reference.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  12. #91
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Forgot about this one, in case someone wants the bolt grades for the IRS fasteners. I agree, I do not like mixing the grades either. I ended up buying flange nuts, like they show in the manual. I was not a fan of the large fender washers and nylon lock nuts.


  13. Likes PNWTim liked this post
  14. #92
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like

    Differential Install

    Engaged in a 2 hour wrestling match today. Got it installed and have to say, nobody on this forum was exaggerating the difficulty of the process. So, so, tight but we got it done. I started the process by reaming out the front mounting ears. This reamer make it a piece of cake. I do think there is some possibility of making the holes off center if your not careful.

    Diff with Reamer.jpg

    Got it squeezed in and frankly was really confused over what hardware to use. I think I used the correct bolts but if I didn't I guess I can buy replacements. I do have one question though - the metal inserts for the front extend out of the poly bushings by about an 1/8th of an inch. I don't understand why this is so? They could easily be the correct length and still function correctly so if anyone knows the reason for this or if I did something wrong please let me know.

    Diff Overhead.jpg

    Close up of the bushing in question. Both sides are identical:

    Bushing Pic.jpg
    Last edited by PNWTim; 01-29-2025 at 10:56 PM.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  15. Likes 460.465USMC liked this post
  16. #93
    Senior Member edwardb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lake Orion, Michigan
    Posts
    10,884
    Post Thanks / Like
    That gap is apparently normal. Many others have reported it and received feedback from FFR that it's OK. As you found out from installing the center section, it's a tight fit. Once bolted in place and all bolts to torque values, it's not going anywhere. My two IRS builders are from several years ago and didn't have that. But either FFR or Ford changed a bit since then. Not to worry.
    Build 1: Mk3 Roadster #5125. Sold 11/08/2014. Build 2: Mk4 Roadster #7750. Sold 04/10/2017. Build Thread
    Build 3: Mk4 Roadster 20th Anniversary #8674. Sold 09/07/2020. Build Thread and Video. Build 4: Gen 3 Type 65 Coupe #59. Gen 3 Coyote. Legal 03/04/2020. Build Thread and Video
    Build 5: 35 Hot Rod Truck #138. LS3 and 4L65E auto. Rcvd 01/05/2021. Legal 04/20/2023. Build Thread. Sold 11/9/2023.

  17. #94
    Senior Member Jphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bonney Lake, WA
    Posts
    215
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mine is the same. The real disappointing news is if you have the rear sway bar - I just learned I must remove those lower IRS bolts again to install the sway bar mounts. Should be easier second time around - I hope.

    I wish FFR would have made a note in the build manual regarding this. Also, the only instructions for installing the sway bars are on the Instructions page of the FFR parts page, and only for the Roadster, so you have to use those instructions for the Coupe sway bars.
    Jim Phoenix
    Coupe-R delivered 8/10/2024
    289 USRRC, F5R1011063RD - delivered same day

    Coupe-R has a Ford Performance 363 mated to a TKX, 18084.
    Many details on my Coupe-R are different from a typical Coupe build because mine is not street legal, race only.

    289 has a BP 302 mated to a TKX 18084.

    "For a little more, you can do it yourself." - Ed Hollingsworth... 6-Pack forums

  18. #95
    Senior Member 460.465USMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWTim View Post
    Close up of the bushing in question. Both sides are identical:

    Bushing Pic.jpg
    Both of my IRS builds have been like you showed. Like others noted above, I think you're good.

    I couldn't agree more, it's a fight to get it up in there, especially if you're working solo (like yours truly). Congrats! One of your first milestones in the build completed!
    Chris
    Coupe complete kit. Index. Delivered: 4/22/24. Build Thread. Coyote Gen 4X. T-56. IRS w/3.55. Wilwoods. PS. HVAC. Side windows.
    MK4 Complete kit. Build Thread Index. Delivered: 10/15/2020. Legal: 7/25/23. Coyote Gen3. TKO600 (0.64 OD). IRS w/3.55. PS. Wilwoods. Sway bars. This build is dedicated to my son, Benjamin. Build Thread.

  19. Thanks PNWTim thanked for this post
  20. #96
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Jphoenix View Post
    Mine is the same. The real disappointing news is if you have the rear sway bar - I just learned I must remove those lower IRS bolts again to install the sway bar mounts. Should be easier second time around - I hope.

    I wish FFR would have made a note in the build manual regarding this. Also, the only instructions for installing the sway bars are on the Instructions page of the FFR parts page, and only for the Roadster, so you have to use those instructions for the Coupe sway bars.
    Jim, thanks for the heads up. I actually opted for only a front sway bar based on feedback from a couple of coupe owners. I can honestly say, if I had to pull those lower bolts out to install it I would probably reconsider regardless. But you are correct, there should be a footnote or something in the manual that says "in the event you are.....".
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  21. #97
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by 460.465USMC View Post
    Both of my IRS builds have been like you showed. Like others noted above, I think you're good.

    I couldn't agree more, it's a fight to get it up in there, especially if you're working solo (like yours truly). Congrats! One of your first milestones in the build completed!
    It certainly felt like a milestone! I was lucky and had my son to help me so that was a blessing.

    It's definitely one of those "a little bit up, a little bit forward, now a little bit down, now a little...".
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  22. Likes 460.465USMC liked this post
  23. #98
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by edwardb View Post
    That gap is apparently normal. Many others have reported it and received feedback from FFR that it's OK. As you found out from installing the center section, it's a tight fit. Once bolted in place and all bolts to torque values, it's not going anywhere. My two IRS builders are from several years ago and didn't have that. But either FFR or Ford changed a bit since then. Not to worry.
    Thanks Paul. It's definitely not going anywhere, for sure. I just don't understand why the insert isn't simply flush. Such a basic thing and they are cutting those bushings so why would it be intentionally cut long? I am not an engineer but details like that baffle me.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  24. #99
    Senior Member Kbl7td's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    319
    Post Thanks / Like
    Because you don’t want the bolt/washer on the rubber. It’s designed to be tight on the bushing. The bushing to rubber then is what gives it a tiny bit of flex.

  25. Likes PNWTim liked this post
  26. #100
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mine is the same way also. If you ever have to do it again on your own, an engine hoist and some ratchet straps work well. I also used some ratchet straps between the back of the frame and the mounts to pull the rear mounts back some.

  27. Thanks PNWTim thanked for this post
  28. #101
    Senior Member Jphoenix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Bonney Lake, WA
    Posts
    215
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWTim View Post
    Jim, thanks for the heads up. I actually opted for only a front sway bar based on feedback from a couple of coupe owners. I can honestly say, if I had to pull those lower bolts out to install it I would probably reconsider regardless. But you are correct, there should be a footnote or something in the manual that says "in the event you are.....".
    My mistake, the sway bar mount actually goes through the lower control arm - the photo in the instructions is not very clear - but it becomes clear once under the car. Thank heaven I don't have to remove those IRS mount bolts!!
    Jim Phoenix
    Coupe-R delivered 8/10/2024
    289 USRRC, F5R1011063RD - delivered same day

    Coupe-R has a Ford Performance 363 mated to a TKX, 18084.
    Many details on my Coupe-R are different from a typical Coupe build because mine is not street legal, race only.

    289 has a BP 302 mated to a TKX 18084.

    "For a little more, you can do it yourself." - Ed Hollingsworth... 6-Pack forums

  29. Likes 460.465USMC liked this post
  30. #102
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like

    All Things Ball Joints

    This post is a two parter - first is a question re: seating of the ball joint. I am using the Mevotech FF supplied ball joints and curious if this is as far as they thread in? They aren't threaded all the way to the top so I am assuming this is the case but if someone could please verify I would appreciate. Not sure if you can tell from the picture but the gap is about 3/32. The last 1/8" of the ball joint (towards the top) is unthreaded, smooth metal making it seem unlikely it would thread any further.

    Ball Joint.jpg

    Threaded in all the way - I think
    Ball Joint Gap.jpg

    And now to question(s) two. I know many on the forums opt to purchase the Howe Racing ball joints due to a real or perceived issue with threading in the Mevotech units. I like to try and use the supplied parts when it makes sense and in this case I thought it did. I was able to thread in the first one pretty much all the way by hand. No problem, piece of cake. But now on to the second one. 1 to 1 1/2 threads and full stop. No passing go, no collecting anything but barked knuckles. I chucked a wire brush in my Dremel and stripped all the powdercoat/paint from both the control arm and ball joint. Earned maybe an additional half turn. So, my questions are these: is this just ball joint roulette or is there a methodology to getting these things put together? I don't really want to spend $200 on the Howe units but I am also not going to fight these for several hours. If anyone has any insight, learnings or wisdom they can impart, I would greatly appreciate it.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  31. #103
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWTim View Post
    This post is a two parter - first is a question re: seating of the ball joint. I am using the Mevotech FF supplied ball joints and curious if this is as far as they thread in? They aren't threaded all the way to the top so I am assuming this is the case but if someone could please verify I would appreciate. Not sure if you can tell from the picture but the gap is about 3/32. The last 1/8" of the ball joint (towards the top) is unthreaded, smooth metal making it seem unlikely it would thread any further.

    Ball Joint.jpg

    Threaded in all the way - I think
    Ball Joint Gap.jpg

    And now to question(s) two. I know many on the forums opt to purchase the Howe Racing ball joints due to a real or perceived issue with threading in the Mevotech units. I like to try and use the supplied parts when it makes sense and in this case I thought it did. I was able to thread in the first one pretty much all the way by hand. No problem, piece of cake. But now on to the second one. 1 to 1 1/2 threads and full stop. No passing go, no collecting anything but barked knuckles. I chucked a wire brush in my Dremel and stripped all the powdercoat/paint from both the control arm and ball joint. Earned maybe an additional half turn. So, my questions are these: is this just ball joint roulette or is there a methodology to getting these things put together? I don't really want to spend $200 on the Howe units but I am also not going to fight these for several hours. If anyone has any insight, learnings or wisdom they can impart, I would greatly appreciate it.
    Mine seats all the way.

    20240107_161438.jpg

    I had to put the ball joint in the vice and use the arm to install and seat it, per FFR.

  32. #104
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by burchfieldb View Post
    Mine seats all the way.

    20240107_161438.jpg

    I had to put the ball joint in the vice and use the arm to install and seat it, per FFR.
    Thanks. I just went back out to the shop and tried the freezer and heat. I got it halfway in but stopped dead. Guess I will keep trying. Might try swapping them side to side just to see if there is any difference.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  33. #105
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    I would reach out to FFR if you can't get it resolved. I am not sure of the root cause, maybe the threaded part gets distorted during welding? Do you have a machine shop close by?

  34. #106
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by burchfieldb View Post
    I would reach out to FFR if you can't get it resolved. I am not sure of the root cause, maybe the threaded part gets distorted during welding? Do you have a machine shop close by?
    I am not sure what the issue is but it seems to be fairly arbitrary and random based on the threads I have read. One threaded nearly the entire way by hand, the other went one turn. If I had to guess, both are probably machined to pretty close tolerances with a plus or minus. If you end up with a male and female pair erring on the opposite ends of the ranges they won't go together. I had to walk away yesterday before I launched one over the fence but I am going to try swapping and see if I can split the difference.

    Unfortunately, no machine shop close by. I will probably purchase Moog replacements for $40 if I can't get them to go today.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  35. #107
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    399
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWTim View Post
    I am not sure what the issue is but it seems to be fairly arbitrary and random based on the threads I have read. One threaded nearly the entire way by hand, the other went one turn. If I had to guess, both are probably machined to pretty close tolerances with a plus or minus. If you end up with a male and female pair erring on the opposite ends of the ranges they won't go together. I had to walk away yesterday before I launched one over the fence but I am going to try swapping and see if I can split the difference.

    Unfortunately, no machine shop close by. I will probably purchase Moog replacements for $40 if I can't get them to go today.
    Lol, I know that feeling! Probably for the best if you can't get them to go in, it would likely may it easier to replace later on. I did use the recommend red loctite, maybe that added some lubrication to help it thread in and not bind.

  36. Likes PNWTim liked this post
  37. #108
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like

    Out with the Old, in with the New

    Trying for a quick win after losing the battle with the ball joints. Made a "crib" to support the hub out of 1" black pipe while I drove out the studs. I had intended to press them out with my vise but that was a non-starter for me. Supported the hub on the back anvil of the vice and after a couple sharp raps they popped right out.

    Old Studs Hub.jpg

    Ran the new studs in using a couple of extra thick grade 8 washers, grease and two lugs nuts

    New Studs Hub.jpg

    Not terribly exciting but progress is progress.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  38. Likes Just 1 More liked this post
  39. #109
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    Exeter, Rhode Island
    Posts
    37
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by PNWTim View Post
    This post is a two parter - first is a question re: seating of the ball joint. I am using the Mevotech FF supplied ball joints and curious if this is as far as they thread in? They aren't threaded all the way to the top so I am assuming this is the case but if someone could please verify I would appreciate. Not sure if you can tell from the picture but the gap is about 3/32. The last 1/8" of the ball joint (towards the top) is unthreaded, smooth metal making it seem unlikely it would thread any further.

    Ball Joint.jpg

    Threaded in all the way - I think
    Ball Joint Gap.jpg

    And now to question(s) two. I know many on the forums opt to purchase the Howe Racing ball joints due to a real or perceived issue with threading in the Mevotech units. I like to try and use the supplied parts when it makes sense and in this case I thought it did. I was able to thread in the first one pretty much all the way by hand. No problem, piece of cake. But now on to the second one. 1 to 1 1/2 threads and full stop. No passing go, no collecting anything but barked knuckles. I chucked a wire brush in my Dremel and stripped all the powdercoat/paint from both the control arm and ball joint. Earned maybe an additional half turn. So, my questions are these: is this just ball joint roulette or is there a methodology to getting these things put together? I don't really want to spend $200 on the Howe units but I am also not going to fight these for several hours. If anyone has any insight, learnings or wisdom they can impart, I would greatly appreciate it.
    Before I installed the driver side ball joint I set up a wire brush in a drill to completely remove powder coating from male and female threads. I put red loctite on the threads and started threading the ball joint. It did not just thread right in by hand. Loaded the control arm in the vise and tightened it with a BA wrench until it would not turn. It looked exactly like your unseated ball joint. I was as frustrated as you and went back to work on other shop projects. I needed the drill. I grabbed the drill and realized the new wire brush still looked new. The parts had not been wire brushed and I drove the coating power (coating flakes) into the female threads either galling the thread or creating a thickened red loctite bond. My wife would call that senior moment,"slippage" (:-)
    I bought another control arm and ball joint from FFR fearing the part was toast. They're down the road and it was a good excuse to visit. Wire brushing the ball joint and control arm allowed the ball joints to twist in with minimal effort.
    I purchased a tool a few years ago to remove rusted bolts, Solary induction heater. I put the "damaged" control arm in the vise and wrapped the supplied element around the ball joint and heated it until it started to smoke. That thing actually came out with a bit of effort. Both ball joint and control arm threads were toast.
    Last edited by Peter Ross; 02-02-2025 at 07:39 PM.

  40. Thanks PNWTim thanked for this post
  41. #110
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Ross View Post
    Before I installed the driver side ball joint I set up a wire brush in a drill to completely remove powder coating from male and female threads. I put red loctite on the threads and started threading the ball joint. It did not just thread right in by hand. Loaded the control arm in the vise and tightened it with a BA wrench until it would not turn. It looked exactly like your unseated ball joint. I was as frustrated as you and went back to work on other shop projects. I needed the drill. I grabbed the drill and realized the new wire brush still looked new. The parts had not been wire brushed and I drove the coating power (coating flakes) into the female threads either galling the thread or creating a thickened red loctite bond. My wife would call that senior moment,"slippage" (:-)
    I bought another control arm and ball joint from FFR fearing the part was toast. They're down the road and it was a good excuse to visit. Wire brushing the ball joint and control arm allowed the ball joints to twist in with minimal effort.
    I purchased a tool a few years ago to remove rusted bolts, Solary induction heater. I put the "damaged" control arm in the vise and wrapped the supplied element around the ball joint and heated it until it started to smoke. That thing actually came out with a bit of effort. Both ball joint and control arm threads were toast.
    Thanks Peter. I ordered replacement Moog ball joints today. There are certain things I am willing to futz with but with the track record these things have I just decided I was done with it. I did try switching them side to side this morning but it didn't make any difference. Kind of bummed because I paid for the darn things but I am a firm believer new parts should not go together with this kind of difficulty. I will be very curious to see if the replacements thread right in - I will know Wednesday and report back.
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

  42. #111
    Senior Member 460.465USMC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    1,038
    Post Thanks / Like
    That's a bummer, Tim. I've read about builders encountering this issue for a few years now. Somehow, they went in fairly well on both my builds. But, I did have to use some leverage. I hope your replacements thread right in without a battle.
    Chris
    Coupe complete kit. Index. Delivered: 4/22/24. Build Thread. Coyote Gen 4X. T-56. IRS w/3.55. Wilwoods. PS. HVAC. Side windows.
    MK4 Complete kit. Build Thread Index. Delivered: 10/15/2020. Legal: 7/25/23. Coyote Gen3. TKO600 (0.64 OD). IRS w/3.55. PS. Wilwoods. Sway bars. This build is dedicated to my son, Benjamin. Build Thread.

  43. #112
    Senior Member PNWTim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Damascus OR USA
    Posts
    282
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by 460.465USMC View Post
    That's a bummer, Tim. I've read about builders encountering this issue for a few years now. Somehow, they went in fairly well on both my builds. But, I did have to use some leverage. I hope your replacements thread right in without a battle.
    I know, kind of annoying. I kind of felt like I gave it the old college try too, but no dice. I received the Moog replacements yesterday and they threaded right in so go figure. Like I said previously, seems there is a little "ball joint roulette" going on and I landed on green 00. I even used Erik Treves' technique of freezer on the ball joint and heat gun on the control arm but still didn't cooperate. In the rear view mirror now so moving on. Really enjoying the suspension work, it's like a big erector set (dating myself I know).
    Build 1 - 1969 Camaro Build Thread Here: https://www.camaros.net/threads/tims...y-getter.45926
    Build 2 - 1965 Daytona Coupe # 620 Build Thread Here: https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/show...-Type-65-Build

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Julio Car Custom

Visit our community sponsor